Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Assessing the impact of biomedical research in academic institutions of disparate sizes

Original Submission
12 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - VANA SYPSA
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darren C Greenwood
23 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Grant Lewison
8 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mieke van Driel
1 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - VANA SYPSA
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
12 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darren C Greenwood
22 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Grant Lewison
4 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mieke van Driel
23 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - VANA SYPSA
Resubmission - Version 11
23 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Resubmission - Version 12
Submitted Manuscript version 12
Resubmission - Version 13
Submitted Manuscript version 13
4 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amy Blue
25 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - VANA SYPSA
Resubmission - Version 14
25 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 14
Publishing
29 May 2009 Editorially accepted
29 May 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-33

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page