Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Enck |
29 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold |
27 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Enck |
15 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold |
2 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
5 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
16 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
23 Jun 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Jun 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-9-41 |
You can find further information about peer review here.