Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Jul 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
29 Oct 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Fay |
28 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Hude Quan |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Fay |
7 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Hude Quan |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
7 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Hude Quan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
15 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Hude Quan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
15 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
16 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Hude Quan |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
16 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
19 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Hude Quan |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
19 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jan 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jan 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-9-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.