Peer Review reports
From: Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - James Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
13 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Rodgers |
21 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen J Smith |
21 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rosaline Barbour |
11 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - James Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen J Smith |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
3 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - James Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
5 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - James Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
5 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
10 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - James Thomas |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
10 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
11 Aug 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Aug 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 |
You can find further information about peer review here.