|
Study
|
Risk of bias
|
Sensitivity to change validity estimate
|
|---|
|
Sequence generation (N)
|
Blinding of outcome assessors
|
Adherence (≥75 %)
|
Baseline imbalance
|
Incomplete data
|
Pre-post change in LSI (exercice group)
|
Pre-post change in LSI (control group)
|
|---|
|
Bourke et al. [52]a
|
Low (50)
|
Low
|
Yes (95 %)
|
Low
|
Low
|
2.31
|
.24
|
|
Bourke et al. [53]a
|
Low (18)
|
Highb
|
Yes (90 %)
|
Unclearc
|
Highd
|
1.67
|
1.17
|
|
Bourke et al. [54]a
|
Low (100)
|
Low
|
Yes (88 %)
|
Low
|
Low
|
1.63
|
.30
|
|
Broderick et al. [55]
|
Low (43)
|
Low
|
Yes (78 %)
|
Unclearc
|
Highd
|
1.35
|
-.14
|
|
Cormie et al. [57]a
|
Low (20)
|
Low
|
Yes (93 %)
|
Low
|
Low
|
.45
|
.10
|
|
Perna et al. [51]
|
Low (51)
|
Low
|
Yes (83 %)
|
Low
|
Low
|
1.88
|
.27
|
- LSI Leisure score index. Validity estimates are reported as Cohen’s d. aThe recall period of the GSLTPAQ was not explicitly stated. bOnly data analysts were blind to group assignment.cReported only for socio-demographic and medical variables; however, the analyses were adjusted for baseline LSI. dLast observation carried forward was the strategies used to deal with missing data. dComplete cases analysis was performed; two participants dropped-out (7 %)
