Skip to main content

Table 5 Importance and feasibility of needed pain management services and support from community stakeholders grouped by recruitment methoda

From: Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting

Importance rating

Feasibility rating

Category of services or support needed to improve outcomes of persons with chronic pain

Snowball sampling stakeholders mean (SD)

Purposive plus convenience sampling stakeholders mean (SD)

Diff

P Valueb

Snowball sampling stakeholders mean (SD)

Purposive plus convenience sampling stakeholders mean (SD)

Diff

P Valueb

Professional Chronic Pain Support

4.26 (0.63)

4.04 (0.71)

0.22

0.195

3.89 (0.84)

3.66 (1.01)

0.23

0.324

Nutrition Program

4.16 (0.96)

3.75 (1.14)

0.41

0.124

3.83 (0.86)

3.33 (1.22)

0.50

0.059

Massage Therapy

4.07 (0.78)

4.42 (0.52)

−0.35

0.045

3.73 (1.07)

4.00 (0.95)

−0.27

0.297

Education/Outreach

3.90 (0.71)

3.87 (0.93)

0.03

0.884

3.71 (0.82)

3.73 (0.97)

−0.02

0.929

City Improvements/Transportation

3.83 (0.71)

3.21 (0.97)

0.62

0.004

3.50 (0.83)

3.23 (1.09)

0.27

0.265

Non-Professional Chronic Pain Support

3.81 (0.76)

3.83 (0.85)

−0.02

0.921

3.71 (0.96)

3.60 (1.00)

0.11

0.657

Water Therapy

3.78 (0.80)

3.86 (1.08)

−0.08

0.735

3.54 (0.91)

3.35 (1.30)

0.19

0.494

Exercise/Fitness Facility

3.71 (0.59)

3.77 (0.86)

−0.06

0.742

3.66 (0.64)

3.54 (0.96)

0.12

0.552

  1. aOrdered by priority rating of the Snowball Sampling Group
  2. bTwo-sample t test with unequal variances assumption