Number | Theme | Original checklist question | Number | ImpRess question |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Motivation (max score 10) | Does the study describe why management decided to subject the employee population to the organisational change? | 1 | Does the existing evidence suggest the intervention is likely to be cost effective? |
2 | Does the existing evidence suggest the intervention is likely to be effective for the primary outcome? | |||
3 | Does the existing evidence suggest the intervention is likely to be effective for other key outcomes? | |||
4 | Are there other benefits for the patient (qualitative)? | |||
5 | Are there benefits for the organisation? | |||
2 | Theory of change (max score 8) | Was the intervention design influenced by a theory of change describing the proposed pathway from implementation to health outcome? | 6 | Are the outcomes clearly defined? |
7 | Is how the intervention works clearly defined? | |||
8 | Is the design suitable for the kind of intervention (RCT)? | |||
9 | Is there a coherent theoretical base? | |||
3 | Implementation context (max score 4) | Does the study provide any useful contextual information relevant to the implementation of the intervention? | 10 | Is the intervention standardised? |
11 | Can it be widely implemented in to practice (following on from a research setting)? | |||
4 | Experience (max score 4) | Does the study establish whether those implementing the intervention had appropriate experience? | 12 | Is the skills and experience of the person delivering the intervention clearly described? |
13 | Is there monitoring of the delivery (attendance/adherence) of the intervention? | |||
5 | Planning consultations (max score 4) | Is there a report of consultation/collaboration processes between managers, employees and any other relevant parties during the planning stage? | 14 | Is the amount of time necessary to set up the intervention specified? |
15 | Is the planning and setting up of the sessions clearly defined? | |||
6 | Delivery collaborations (max score 4) | Is there a report of consultation/collaboration processes between managers, employees and any other relevant parties during the delivery stage? | 16 | Does it specify the amount of time required for each session and for the duration of the programme? |
17 | Are the potential and facilitator barriers to the delivery of the intervention described? | |||
7 | Manager support (max score 2) | Were on-site managers/supervisors supportive of the intervention? | 18 | Is the level of managerial support described during the intervention/evaluation? |
8 | Employee support (max score 2) | Were employees supportive of the intervention? | 19 | Is the level of support required by staff members to deliver the intervention described? |
9 | Resources (max score 10) | Does the study give information about the resources required in implementing the intervention? | 20 | Are the resources required to deliver the intervention specified? |
21 | Is the training costs specified? | |||
22 | Are the training materials specified? | |||
23 | Are there manuals for the intervention? | |||
24 | Are the materials easy to source? | |||
10 | Population characteristics (max score 4) | Does the study provide information on the characteristics of the people for whom the intervention was beneficial, and the characteristics of those for whom it was harmful or ineffective? | 25 | Are the population characteristics specified? |
26 | Does it specify who benefits most from the intervention? |