Peer Review reports
From: A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Mar 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Apr 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Simmonds |
| 18 May 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Debray |
| 6 Sep 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Doneal Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 23 Sep 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Debray |
| 30 Sep 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Simmonds |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 31 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - Doneal Thomas |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 2 Feb 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Feb 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12874-017-0307-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.