Skip to main content

Table 2 The 90th percentile confidence intervals for all performance measure estimates of each method for Scenario 1 in Table 1 (corresponding to Fig. 1)

From: Outlier classification performance of risk adjustment methods when profiling multiple providers

Measure

K

L R F

L R R

g P S A

g P S W

g P S WT

g P S MWS

Sensitivity

10

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 0.50

0.00, 0.50

0.00, 0.50

0.00, 0.50

0.00, 0.50

 

20

0.25, 1.00

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

 

30

0.33, 1.00

0.00, 0.33

0.00, 0.33

0.00, 0.17

0.00, 0.33

0.00, 0.33

 

40

0.50, 1.00

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

0.00, 0.25

 

50

0.50, 0.90

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

Specificity

10

0.50, 1.00

1.00, 1.00

1.00, 1.00

0.88, 1.00

0.88, 1.00

0.88, 1.00

 

20

0.56, 0.88

0.94, 1.00

0.94, 1.00

0.88, 1.00

0.94, 1.00

0.88, 1.00

 

30

0.54, 0.88

0.96, 1.00

0.96, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

 

40

0.56, 0.84

0.97, 1.00

0.97, 1.00

0.91, 1.00

0.94, 1.00

0.91, 1.00

 

50

0.57, 0.80

0.98, 1.00

0.98, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.90, 1.00

PPV

10

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

 

20

0.20, 0.67

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

 

30

0.25, 0.58

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

 

40

0.26, 0.55

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

 

50

0.27, 0.53

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

NPV

10

0.75, 1.00

0.80, 0.89

0.80, 0.89

0.78, 0.89

0.78, 0.89

0.78, 0.89

 

20

0.80, 1.00

0.80, 0.84

0.80, 0.84

0.78, 0.84

0.79, 0.84

0.78, 0.84

 

30

0.82, 1.00

0.79, 0.86

0.79, 0.86

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.86

0.79, 0.85

 

40

0.84, 1.00

0.79, 0.84

0.79, 0.84

0.78, 0.84

0.79, 0.84

0.78, 0.84

 

50

0.84, 0.97

0.80, 0.85

0.80, 0.85

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

  1. K = number of providers; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value