Skip to main content

Table 2 Simulated type I error rates of the testing approach in specific scenarios

From: Hypothesis testing in Bayesian network meta-analysis

n ik

piP, piS

Δ

contrast-based

arm-based

1000

0.2

log(0.9)

0.024

0.024

  

log(1)

0.024

0.024

  

log(1.1)

0.024

0.025

200

0.1

log(0.9)

0.023

0.025

  

log(0.95)

0.022

0.025

  

log(1)

0.022

0.026

  

log(1.05)

0.021

0.025

  

log(1.1)

0.023

0.026

400

0.05

log(0.5)

0.032

0.024

  

log(2)

0.017

0.028

  1. nik denotes the number of treatment arms, piP and piS the success rates in arm P and S, respectively, in trial i (i=1,…,16), and Δ is the non-inferiority or superiority margin, respectively. We used 50,000 simulated data sets to estimate the type I error rate. The nominal level of α was 0.025