Type of sampling | Description |
---|---|
Extreme or deviant case sampling | • Selecting illuminative cases that exemplify ‘extreme’ or ‘deviant’ contexts or examples, for instance:   – where an innovation in a primary study was perceived notably as a success or failure   – where findings of a primary study are very different from those of most studies identified for the synthesis |
Maximum variation sampling | • Constructed by:   – identifying key dimensions of variation, and then   – finding cases that vary from each other as much as possible along these dimensions • This sampling yields:   – ‘high-quality, detailed descriptions of each case, which are useful for documenting uniqueness, and   – important shared patterns that cut across cases and derive their significance from having emerged out of heterogeneity’ (Patton, 2002, p. 235) |
Snowball or chain sampling | • Trying to locate a key work in the field through talking with experts or locating a key article that is often cited • Then follow on with primary studies that have cited the key or landmark study |
Theoretical or operational construct sampling | • Selecting cases that represent important theoretical or operational constructs about the phenomenon of interest • Set out operational definitions of key theories or constructs related to the phenomenon of interest • Develop boundaries for these by creating specific inclusion and exclusion criteria in relation to selecting primary studies for the synthesis |
Criterion sampling | • Used by those trying to construct a comprehensive understanding • Studies are sampled based on a predetermined criteria • Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria are clearly stated • Studies are then analysed as a whole |
Stratified purposeful sampling | • Following on from criterion sampling where each of the criteria would become a sample • Stratified samples are samples within samples where each stratum, or group, is fairly homogenous and are analysed within these groups • Useful for examining variation in a key phenomena of interest |
Purposeful random sampling | • Randomly select from the list of included studies for inclusion in the analysis • For example, use a random internet based selector, choose every 3rd included study or pull study names from a hat • Provides an unbiased way of selecting studies for inclusion but may not provide studies with rich data |
Combination or mixed purposeful sampling | • Choosing a combination or mix of sampling strategies to best fit your purpose   – For some syntheses, it may be useful to use a combination or mix of sampling strategies. For instance, by applying theoretical sampling in a first stage and deviant case sampling in a second stage. This should be guided by the review methods and purpose, and the time available |