BMC Medical Research Methodology

Table 3 Concordance correlation coefficients between algorithms with the log diary method

From: Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents

	Wear time	Sedentary time	MVPA time
Troiano et al. (2008)[11]	0.79 [0.65; 0.88]	0.81 [0.72; 0.87]	0.86 [0.81; 0.90]
Choi et al. (2012)[15]	0.79 [0.66; 0.88]	0.79 [0.70; 0.86]	0.86 [0.80; 0.90]
60 min	0.80 [0.67; 0.89]	0.81 [0.72; 0.87]	0.86 [0.81; 0.90]
30 min	0.80 [0.66; 0.88]	0.79 [0.69; 0.86]	0.86 [0.81; 0.90]
20 min	0.77 [0.63; 0.86]	0.73 [0.61; 0.82]	0.86 [0.81; 0.90]
15 min	0.73 [0.57; 0.83]	0.65 [0.51; 0.76]	0.86 [0.81; 0.90]
10 min	0.60 [0.43; 0.73]	0.46 [0.31; 0.59]	0.86 [0.81; 0.90]

Concordance correlation coefficients and theirs 95% confidence intervals for the agreement assessment between methods with the gold standard method (log diary method)

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2288

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com