Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey

Original Submission
25 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan Ruano Ruiz
22 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Allers
5 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan Ruano Ruiz
8 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Allers
17 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Allers
1 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Mathes
6 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Mar 2019 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0715-y

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page