Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of DRMAs with protocol registration or development and matched controls

From: Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey

Basic information

Total sample (N = 135)

P value

Registered (n = 45)

Matched (n = 90)

Author number [median (IQR)]

8 (7 to 9)

5 (3 to 8)

<  0.01

 > = 6

38 (84.44%)

43 (48.78%)

 

 < 6

7 (15.56%)

47 (52.22%)

 

Regions*

 Asian

10 (22.22%)

20 (22.22%)

Reference

 European

32 (71.11%)

44 (48.89%)

≈1

 America

3 (6.67%)

25 (27.78%)

 Australia

0 (0.00%)

1 (2.22%)

Database searched [median (IQR)]

3 (2 to 7)

2 (2 to 3)

0.52

 > = 2

36 (80.00%)

76 (84.44%)

 

 < 2

9 (20.00%)

14 (15.56%)

 

Funding

  

0.88

 Yes

38 (84.44%)

63 (70.00%)

 

 No

4 (8.89%)

6 (6.67%)

 

 Not reported

3 (6.67%)

21 (23.33%)

Journal type

  

0.60

 General journal

7 (15.56%)

11 (12.22%)

 

 Specialist journal

38 (84.44%)

79 (87.78%)

 

Publish year*

  

0.6

 2011–2013

18 (40.00%)

32 (35.56%)

 

 2014–2016

15 (33.33%)

38 (42.22%)

 

 2017~

12 (26.67%)

20 (22.22%)

 

Use of reporting checklist

 Yes

36

56

0.02

 No

9

34

 

The score of AMSTAR [median (IQR)]

9 (8 to 11)

9 (7 to 10)

The score of PRISMA [median (IQR)]

22 (22 to 23)

22 (21 to 24)

  1. A general journal means it published articles on all areas (e.g. plos one) or focus on whole medicine area (e.g. BMJ open). For specialist journal, we treat it as those publish articles only on a certain type of disease (e.g. cancer) or a certain body system (e.g. urology)
  2. IQR Interquartile range
  3. *Regions (Asian versus Non-Asian) and publish year were matched variables by propensity score