Table 3 Mean total number of recruited patients in the treament group for the naive approach and the resampling CI method for different numbers of patients in the control group
From: Adaptive propensity score procedure improves matching in prospective observational trials
n control | Naiv | 99%-CI | 95%-CI | 90%-CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | 57.20 | 103.05 | 94.11 | 89.97 |
75 | 81.88 | 130.51 | 122.83 | 119.10 |
100 | 106.24 | 158.13 | 150.99 | 147.45 |
125 | 130.73 | 187.46 | 180.42 | 176.88 |
150 | 155.34 | 215.80 | 208.85 | 205.32 |
175 | 179.98 | 245.10 | 238.09 | 234.52 |
200 | 204.84 | 273.86 | 266.81 | 263.19 |
225 | 229.42 | 303.28 | 296.11 | 292.42 |
250 | 254.39 | 331.75 | 324.53 | 320.80 |
275 | 279.19 | 361.06 | 353.69 | 349.90 |
300 | 304.00 | 389.50 | 382.07 | 378.21 |