Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Methodological steps used by authors of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials: a cross-sectional study

Original Submission
29 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hoang Thi Nam Giang
1 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane Lorenzetti
5 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia M. Fraser
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Hoang Thi Nam Giang
1 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane Lorenzetti
9 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cynthia M. Fraser
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hoang Thi Nam Giang
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hoang Thi Nam Giang
Resubmission - Version 5
9 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hoang Thi Nam Giang
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 6
12 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hoang Thi Nam Giang
Resubmission - Version 7
12 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
19 Jun 2019 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0780-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\