Skip to main content

Table 2 Background characteristics of the participants, 6 month olds (n = 266)

From: Means of increasing response rates in a Norwegian dietary survey among infants – results from a pseudo-randomized pilot study

 

Lotterya (n = 122)

Gift certificateb (n = 144)

Pc

Handwrittend address (n = 134)

Label addresse (n = 132)

Pc

Infant’s gender, n (%)

  

0.98

  

0.22

 boy

62 (51%)

73 (51%)

 

63 (47%)

72 (55%)

 

 girl

60 (49%)

71 (49%)

 

71 (53%)

60 (45%)

 

Geographical region, n (%)

  

0.92

  

0.99

 Oslo/Akershus (capital region)

28 (23%)

34 (24%)

 

30 (22%)

32 (24%)

 

 Hedmark/Oppland

10 (8%)

10 (7%)

 

10 (7%)

10 (8%)

 

 South-Eastern Norway

15 (12%)

24 (17%)

 

19 (14%)

20 (15%)

 

 Agder/Rogaland

21 (17%)

19 (13%)

 

19 (14%)

21 (16%)

 

 Western Norway

23 (19%)

25 (17%)

 

26 (19%)

22 (17%)

 

 Trøndelag

13 (11%)

18 (13%)

 

17 (13%)

14 (11%)

 

Northern Norway

12 (10%)

14 (10%)

 

13 (10%)

13 (10%)

 

Mother’s age, years, n (%)

  

0.53

  

0.033

 20–25

6 (5%)

11 (8%)

 

5 (4%)

12 (9%)

 

 26–30

50 (41%)

60 (42%)

 

60 (45%)

50 (38%)

 

 31–35

41 (34%)

52 (36%)

 

40 (30%)

53 (40%)

 

 ≥36

25 (20%)

21 (15%)

 

29 (22%)

17 (13%)

 

Employment prior to birth, mother, n (%)

  

0.09

  

0.81

 Employed (full/part time)

113 (93%)

124 (86%)

 

120 (90%)

117 (89%)

 

 Not working

9 (7%)

20 (14%)

 

14 (10%)

15 (11%)

 

Who filled in the questionnaire, n (%)

  

0.26

  

0.12

 Mother

114 (93%)

129 (90%)

 

126 (94%)

117 (89%)

 

 Father/mother and father

8 (7%)

15 (10%)

 

8 (6%)

15 (11%)

 

Mother’s educational level, n (%)

  

0.77

  

0.46

 High school or lower

35 (29%)

39 (27%)

 

40 (30%)

34 (26%)

 

 College/university

87 (71%)

105 (73%)

 

94 (70%)

98 (74%)

 

Father’s educational level, n (%)f

  

0.17

  

0.94

 High school or lower

63 (53%)

63 (44%)

 

64 (48%)

62 (48%)

 

 College/university

57 (48%)

80 (56%)

 

69 (52%)

68 (52%)

 
  1. aParticipants took part in a lottery of two prizes; 5000 NOK (500 EUR) and 10,000 NOK (1000 EUR)
  2. bAll participants received a gift certificate worth 500 NOK (50 EUR)
  3. cDifferences in percentages between the two incentive groups and between the two manners of writing name and address and postal or e-mail invitation were tested with the chi-square test
  4. dInvited sample received invitation envelope with a handwritten name and address
  5. eInvited sample received invitation envelope with name and address on a printed label
  6. fThree participants not included due to missing information about father’s education