Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies

Original Submission
2 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michael Barrowman
17 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maja von Cube
22 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Friedrich
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michael Barrowman
3 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maja von Cube
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Michael Barrowman
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
31 Jul 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0808-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\