Table 2 Completeness of reporting of the exercise interventions: total sample and type of cancer subgroups
From: Analysis of reporting completeness in exercise cancer trials: a systematic review
TIDieR item | Total sample n (%) | Breast cancer n (%) | Non-breast cancer n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Item 1. Brief name | 76 (55%) | 36 (52%) | 40 (58%) |
Item 2. Why | 131 (95%) | 66 (96%) | 65 (94%) |
Item 3. What (materials) | 81 (59%) | 40 (58%) | 41 (59%) |
Item 4. What (procedures) | 108 (78%) | 53 (77%) | 55 (80%) |
Item 5a. Who provided (disciplinary background) | 93 (67%) | 44 (64%) | 49 (71%) |
Item 5b. Who provided (expertise, experience, or specific training) | 58 (42%) | 30 (44%) | 28 (41%) |
Item 6. How | 104 (75%) | 54 (78%) | 50 (72%) |
Item 7. Where | 92 (67%) | 40 (58%) | 52 (75%) |
Item 8a. Frequency | 123 (89%) | 60 (87%) | 63 (91%) |
Item 8b. Length | 133 (96%) | 66 (96%) | 67 (97%) |
Item 8c. Duration | 120 (87%) | 63 (91%) | 57 (83%) |
Item 8d. Intensity | 90 (65%) | 39 (56%) | 51 (74%) |
Item 9. Tailoring | 82 (59%) | 37 (54%) | 45 (65%) |
Item 10. Modifications | 70 (51%) | 32 (46%) | 38 (55%) |
Item 11. How well (planned) | 63 (46%) | 30 (43%) | 33 (48%) |
Item 12. How well (actual) | 70 (51%) | 35 (51%) | 35 (51%) |