Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of included systematic review

From: Identifying competing interest disclosures in systematic reviews of surgical interventions and devices: a cross-sectional survey

Characteristics

n = 155

No of authors a

6 (2–21)

No of study included a

7 (1–44)

No of participants included a

1167 (80–19,886)

No of database included a

4 (1–15)

Methodologist involved

23 (14.8)

Cochrane SR

25 (16.1)

PRISMA mentioned

89 (57.4)

Type of journal

 General

109 (70.3)

 Surgical

46 (29.7)

Country of corresponded author

 China

48 (31.0)

 USA

22 (14.2)

 UK

18 (11.6)

 Italy

12 (7.7)

 Australia

12 (7.7)

 Other

43 (27.8)

Type of comparison

 Surgical versus surgical

132 (85.2)

 Surgical versus non-surgical

17 (10.9)

 Surgical versus both

6 (3.9)

Comparisons between different surgical procedures

 Procedures

79 (59.8)

 Devices

53 (40.2)

Specialty

 General

54 (34.9)

 Cardiothoracic

45 (29.0)

 Orthopedic

24 (15.5)

 Other

32 (20.6)

  1. Values in parentheses are percentages unless indicated otherwise
  2. a values are median (range)