Table 3 Participant feedback on the course
Questionnaire items and responses | n (%) (N = 14) |
|---|---|
Course improved professional knowledge of subject | |
Yes | 14 (100%) |
No | 0 (0%) |
Likelihood of making changes in clinical trial recruitment and retention practices | |
Very likely | 10 (71.4%) |
Somewhat likely | 4 (28.6%) |
Somewhat unlikely | 0 (0%) |
Not at all likely | 0 (0%) |
Course materials and presentations were free of bias | |
Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
Disagree | 0 (0%) |
Neutral | 0 (0%) |
Agree | 6 (42.9%) |
Strongly agree | 8 (57.1%) |
Learning materials were of high quality | |
Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
Disagree | 0 (0%) |
Neutral | 0 (0%) |
Agree | 7 (50.0%) |
Strongly agree | 7 (50.0%) |
Format was effective in conveying content | |
Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
Disagree | 0 (0%) |
Neutral | 0 (0%) |
Agree | 6 (42.9%) |
Strongly agree | 8 (57.1%) |
Interactive components of the course aided my comprehension of the content | |
Strongly disagree | 0 (0%) |
Disagree | 0 (0%) |
Neutral | 1 (7.1%) |
Agree | 6 (42.9%) |
Strongly agree | 7 (50.0%) |
Content | |
Poor | 0 (0%) |
Fair | 0 (0%) |
Average | 0 (0%) |
Good | 6 (42.9%) |
Excellent | 8 (57.1%) |
Provided useful research information | |
Poor | 0 (0%) |
Fair | 0 (0%) |
Average | 0 (0%) |
Good | 3 (21.4%) |
Excellent | 11 (78.6%) |
Conveyed the subject matter clearly | |
Poor | 0 (0%) |
Fair | 0 (0%) |
Average | 0 (0%) |
Good | 3 (21.4%) |
Excellent | 11 (78.6%) |
Met learning objectives | |
Poor | 0 (0%) |
Fair | 0 (0%) |
Average | 0 (0%) |
Good | 4 (28.6%) |
Excellent | 10 (71.4%) |