Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of six statistical methods for interrupted time series studies: empirical evaluation of 190 published series

Original Submission
29 Nov 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
2 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Joanne McKenzie
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2021 Author responded Author comments - Joanne McKenzie
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Mar 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
26 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Joanne McKenzie
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Apr 2021 Author responded Author comments - Joanne McKenzie
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Apr 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Apr 2021 Editorially accepted
26 Jun 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12874-021-01306-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page