Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Standardizing registry data to the OMOP Common Data Model: experience from three pulmonary hypertension databases

Original Submission
21 Dec 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Mar 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Klann
22 Apr 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross D. Williams
20 Jul 2021 Author responded Author comments - Eva-Maria Didden
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jul 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Eva-Maria Didden
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Eva-Maria Didden
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ross D. Williams
6 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Klann
30 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Eva-Maria Didden
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Eva-Maria Didden
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
7 Oct 2021 Editorially accepted
2 Nov 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12874-021-01434-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page