Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19 – a retrospective cross-sectional study

Original Submission
1 Jun 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Ziemann
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
23 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Ziemann
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
9 Nov 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Ziemann
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Nov 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
22 Dec 2021 Author responded Author comments - Sebastian Ziemann
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Dec 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
30 Dec 2021 Editorially accepted
20 Jan 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12874-021-01501-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page