Skip to main content

Table 3 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of informal caregivers that participated in the various components (PROMs, biobank) of NET-QUBIC at baseline

From: Study retention and attrition in a longitudinal cohort study including patient-reported outcomes, fieldwork and biobank samples: results of the Netherlands quality of life and Biomedical cohort study (NET-QUBIC) among 739 head and neck cancer patients and 262 informal caregivers

 

PROMs

Yes

N = 228

PROMs

No

N = 34

P-value

Biobank

Yes

N = 238

Biobank

No

N = 24

P-value

Gender, n (%)

 Men

62 (27%)

8 (24%)

0.65

61 (26%)

9 (38%)

0.21

 Women

166 (73%)

26 (76%)

 

177 (74%)

15 (63%)

 

Age, mean ± SD years

59.3 ± 11.3

55.7 ± 13.3

0.09

58.9 ± 11.7

57.7 ± 10.1

0.63

Relation informal caregiver – patienta, n (%)

  

0.14b

  

0.61b

 Partner

194 (85%)

25 (76%)

 

200 (84%)

19 (83%)

 

 Daughter/son

26 (11%)

5 (15%)

 

27 (11%)

4 (17%)

 

 Other (i.e. sibling, friend, ex-partner)

7 (3%)

3 (9%)

 

10 (4%)

0 (0%)

 
  1. Informal caregivers with PROMs data or biobank samples may have missing data on specific components of the assessment. Results on the representativeness of data for a specific research question may thus differ from above results. Groups were compared using chi square tests, unless otherwise specified. Significant p-values (p < 0.05) were printed in bold
  2. aMissing in two informal caregivers
  3. bCompared using Fisher Exact Test
  4. Abbreviations: PROMs patient-reported outcome measure, SD standard deviation