Skip to main content

Table 6 Simulation study results: coverage rate of the normality-based confidence interval for the \(\hat{\beta}\) regression coefficient for CCA and the IPPW method (18 response models), for nine response mechanism scenarios

From: Inverse probability weighting to handle attrition in cohort studies: some guidance and a call for caution

Scenarioa

γx

γy

CCA

 

IPPW method

Response models

(X), Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4

(X), Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4, Z5, Z6, Z7

(X), Z1, Z3

(X), Z1, Z2, Z3, Z5, Z7

(X), Z1

(X), Z5

(X), Z1, Z5

(X), Z1, Z5, Z7

(X), Z5, Z7

MAR 1

0.0

0.0

94.9

Xb

95.1

95.0

94.9

95.1

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.1

95.0

94.9

95.0

94.9

95.0

95.0

94.9

95.0

MAR 2

0.2

0.0

95.1

Xb

95.1

95.1

95.1

95.0

95.2

95.2

95.1

95.1

95.2

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.2

95.0

95.0

95.1

MAR 3

0.5

0.0

94.9

Xb

95.0

94.9

95.0

95.0

94.8

94.9

94.8

94.9

94.9

94.8

94.9

94.8

94.9

94.9

94.9

94.9

94.9

95.0

MNAR 1

0.0

0.2

95.0

Xb

95.2

95.2

95.1

95.1

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.1

95.2

95.2

95.1

95.1

94.9

95.0

95.0

95.0

95.0

MNAR 2

0.2

0.2

93.8

Xb

94.1

94.3

94.2

94.3

93.8

93.8

93.7

94.0

93.9

93.8

94.0

93.9

93.8

93.8

93.8

93.8

93.9

93.8

MNAR 3

0.5

0.2

89.9

Xb

91.5

91.9

91.5

92.0

90.2

90.3

90.1

90.6

90.8

89.9

90.0

89.8

90.0

89.7

90.0

89.6

89.6

89.9

MNAR 4

0.0

0.5

93.2

Xb

93.6

93.6

93.7

93.7

93.3

93.3

93.3

93.3

93.4

93.4

93.3

93.3

93.3

93.2

93.1

93.2

93.2

93.2

MNAR 5

0.2

0.5

84.3

Xb

86.2

87.0

86.2

87.0

84.4

84.5

84.4

85.4

85.5

84.3

84.6

84.1

84.3

84.3

84.3

84.2

84.2

84.3

MNAR 6

0.5

0.5

63.9

Xb

71.2

73.4

71.2

73.5

66.5

66.8

66.5

69.0

69.4

64.2

64.7

63.9

64.3

63.6

63.6

63.7

63.5

63.4