Skip to main content

Table 2 Causal effects estimated from 200 simulated datasets for each configuration from two MR methods (Bayesian, IVW) when β1=β2=0, using four metrics: mean, standard deviation (sd), coverage and power. The six configurations were generated from three missing rates of the exposures (80%, 50%, 20%) and two levels of IV strength (α=0.3 and 0.1). \(\hat {\beta }_{1}\): estimated causal effect of X1 on \(Y_{1}, \hat {\beta }_{2}\): estimated causal effect of X2 on Y2

From: Bayesian mendelian randomization with study heterogeneity and data partitioning for large studies

Missing rate

α

\(\widehat {\beta _{1}}\)

\(\widehat {\beta _{2}}\)

  

Bayesian

IVW

Bayesian

IVW

  

mean

sd

coverage

mean

sd

coverage

mean

sd

coverage

mean

sd

coverage

80%

0.3

-0.001

0.005

0.960

0.007

0.061

0.955

-0.001

0.005

0.955

-0.005

0.062

0.960

 

0.1

0.004

0.016

0.960

-0.010

0.112

0.965

0.004

0.015

0.960

-0.001

0.130

0.960

50%

0.3

0.000

0.005

0.975

-0.014

0.087

0.935

0.000

0.005

0.955

-0.002

0.090

0.955

 

0.1

0.004

0.013

0.970

0.005

0.188

0.960

0.004

0.013

0.955

-0.011

0.202

0.950

20%

0.3

0.000

0.004

0.950

0.010

0.148

0.930

0.000

0.004

0.965

-0.003

0.152

0.935

 

0.1

0.003

0.012

0.965

0.012

0.394

0.920

0.003

0.012

0.965

0.020

0.361

0.945