Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparing outcomes from tailored meta-analysis with outcomes from a setting specific test accuracy study using routine data of faecal calprotectin testing for inflammatory bowel disease

Original Submission
3 Mar 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
30 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lingxiao Chen
13 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Karoline Freeman
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Karoline Freeman
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Karoline Freeman
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
20 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lingxiao Chen
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Jun 2022 Editorially accepted
12 Jul 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12874-022-01668-9

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page