Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Nested and multipart prospective observational studies, flaming fiasco or efficiently economical?: The Brain, Bone, Heart case study

Original Submission
13 Sep 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - C. Christina Mehta
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - C. Christina Mehta
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - C. Christina Mehta
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
3 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - C. Christina Mehta
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - C. Christina Mehta
Resubmission - Version 7
30 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
4 Jul 2022 Editorially accepted
25 Jul 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12874-022-01675-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page