Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Should RECOVERY have used response adaptive randomisation? Evidence from a simulation study

Original Submission
4 Jan 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
21 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
10 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Tamir Sirkis
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Tamir Sirkis
Resubmission - Version 3
4 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
14 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
19 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Tamir Sirkis
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Jul 2022 Author responded Author comments - Tamir Sirkis
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Jul 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
15 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Jul 2022 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12874-022-01691-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page