Peer Review reports
From: A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
18 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
13 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard McNulty |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
17 May 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard McNulty |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 May 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Jul 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard McNulty |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
20 Jul 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Sep 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12874-022-01696-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.