Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics of the cohort members by clusters

From: Capturing the variety of clinical pathways in patients with schizophrenic disorders through state sequences analysis

 

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

P-value

 

(N = 1,237)

(N = 662)

(N = 294)

 

Male gender

799 (64.6%)

443 (66.9%)

207 (70.4%)

0.143

Age class (years at index date)

 18 - 29

632 (51.1%)

351 (53.0%)

221 (75.2%)

< 0.001

 30 - 40

605 (48.9%)

311 (47.0%)

73 (24.8%)

 

Number of co-treatments:

 0

866 (70.0%)

407 (61.5%)

173 (58.8%)

<0.001

 1-2

351 (28.4%)

247 (37.3%)

121 (41.2%)

 

     \(\ge 3\)

20 (1.6%)

8 (1.2%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Clinical statusa

 Good

636 (51.4%)

324 (48.9%)

105 (35.7%)

<0.001

 Intermediate

121 (9.8%)

57 (8.6%)

14 (4.8%)

 

 Poor

480 (38.8%)

281 (42.5%)

175 (59.5%)

 

Weekly variety of treatments b: mean (SD)

 No treatments

39.6 (12.2)

5.0 (5.9)

1.9 (3.0)

<0.001

 Low

9.0 (9.6)

23.0 (13.7)

7.5 (6.5)

 

 Medium

2.9 (5.0)

22.8 (13.9)

17.9 (8.8)

 

 High

0.5 (2.2)

1.2 (2.9)

24.7 (12.2)

 
  1. aClinical status was assessed by the MCS, and 3 categories were considered: good (score=0), medium (score 1 - 4), poor (score\(\ge 5\));
  2. bTreatments are considered during the first year of follow-up