Peer Review reports
From: Modelling of intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay as a quality measure: a problematic exercise
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Dec 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Mar 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deepak Bhonagiri |
| 8 Apr 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 28 Jun 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 22 Jul 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jul 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 11 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 25 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - John L Moran |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 31 Aug 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deepak Bhonagiri |
| 1 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Sep 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Sep 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12874-023-02028-x |
You can find further information about peer review here.