Skip to main content

Table 6 Rate certainty using GRADE approach

From: Clinical systematic reviews – a brief overview

Increasing the certainty (Rate up)

Decreasing the certainty (Rate down)

• Large effect (e.g.– RR > 5)

• Presence of large dose–response gradient

• Opposing evidence for confounding factors (e.g. no effect showed when confounders likely to increase effect)

• Risk of bias domains- for each study and overall using RoB (2.0) tool

• Inconsistency- Q test, I2 statistics and visual inspection of forest plot are used

• Indirectness – Whether each study answers the review question

• Imprecision- Based on information/sample size and confidence interval in overall study

• Publication bias – Could use funnel plot to diagnose