Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the comparative experiments of six models on five public datasets. Per dataset, the best performing model (bold) and the models within the 95% CI of the best performing model (italics) are highlighted

From: Bayesian parametric models for survival prediction in medical applications

Characteristic

CoxPH, N = 47a

DeepSurv, N = 47a

BPS Exp, N = 47a

BPS Wb, N = 47a

BPS Wb NN, N = 47a

RSF, N = 47a

ACTG

C-Index

0.754 [0.731—0.778]

0.714 [0.691—0.739]

0.739 [0.715—0.763]

0.745 [0.718—0.776]

0.748 [0.724—0.770]

0.729 [0.704—0.751]

GBCS

C-Index

0.736 [0.715—0.757]

0.731 [0.711—0.751]

0.737 [0.721—0.756]

0.735 [0.719—0.751]

0.735 [0.718—0.753]

0.737 [0.718—0.756]

PBC

C-Index

0.820 [0.801—0.838]

0.813 [0.796—0.829]

0.825 [0.808—0.845]

0.824 [0.805—0.843]

0.842 [0.825—0.858]

0.832 [0.814—0.851]

Veteran

C-Index

0.709 [0.692—0.727]

0.699 [0.674—0.724]

0.700 [0.668—0.731]

0.696 [0.665—0.729]

0.704 [0.678—0.730]

0.693 [0.671—0.715]

WHAS

C-Index

0.817 [0.790—0.843]

0.825 [0.804—0.845]

0.828 [0.806—0.850]

0.832 [0.811—0.853]

0.834 [0.814—0.853]

0.821 [0.794—0.848]

  1. aMean [99.6% CrI]
  2. best performing model
  3. within 95% CI of best performing model