From: Reasons for missing evidence in rehabilitation meta-analyses: a cross-sectional meta-research study
Reason for omission | Omitted RCTs | Corresponding IMAs$ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N* | % | |
Inadequate planning | 122 | 17% | 40 | 40% |
Selective reporting | 24 | 3,3% | 15 | 15% |
Incomplete reporting | 60 | 8,4% | 38 | 38% |
Unable to distinguish between selective reporting and inadequate planning | 282 | 39,3% | 68 | 68% |
Justified to be not included | 108 | 15,1% | 43 | 43% |
Other situations | 37 | 5,2% | 16 | 16% |
Not assessed – Language | 20 | 2,8% | 8 | 8% |
Not assessed – Not found and not possible to judge | 64 | 8,9% | 22 | 22% |
TOTAL | 717 | 100% | 100 | Â |