Skip to main content

Table 1 Broad summary of included studies

From: Advancing guideline quality through country-wide and regional quality assessment of CPGs using AGREE: a scoping review

Characteristics

n (%)

Types of studies

 Cross-sectional analysis

34 (59.6)

 Systematic review

17 (29.8)

 Reviewa

6 (8.8)

Year of publication

 2010 – 2014

9 (15.8)

 2015 – 2018

22 (38.6)

 2019 – October 2021

26 (45.6)

Entity responsible for the appraisal

 Government related

4 (7)

 Academic society/Researchers

49 (86)

 Professional society

3 (5)

 Non-governmental organization

1 (2)

Geographical locations by SDG region

 Sub-Saharan Africa

2 (3.7)

 Northern Africa and Western Asia

1 (1.8)

 Central and Southern Asia

2 (3.7)

 Eastern and South-Eastern Asia

20 (38)

 Latin America and the Caribbean

9 (17)

 Oceania

1 (1.8)

 Europe and Northern America

18 (34)

Sampling of CPGs

 No sampleb

14 (24.5)

 Random sample

1 (2)

 Systematic sample

11 (19)

 Topical purposeful sampling

29 (51)

 Other purposeful sampling

2 (3.5)

  1. aThis category broadly includes literature surveys, methodological reviews, narrative reviews, and other non-systematic reviews
  2. bAll country/regional CPGs were included