Skip to main content

Table 1 Possible effect heterogeneity scenarios. The left panel is a directed acyclic graph (DAG) where ZXYU represent the instrument, the exposure, the outcome, and the unmeasured confounders, respectively. M is a variable to be considered. The DAG has different possible scenarios, each of which has different arrow directions (or no arrow, denoted by \(\nleftrightarrow\)) for the X-M and M-Y relationship. Our primary simulation study considers covariates corresponding to scenarios 1, 5, 7, and 9. Scenarios 2, 3, 6, and 8 are considered in an additional simulation study, presented in Supplementary Text

From: A data-adaptive method for investigating effect heterogeneity with high-dimensional covariates in Mendelian randomization

DAG

Scenario

X-M relationship

M-Y relationship

M interpretation

Comments

1

\(X \rightarrow M\)

\(M \rightarrow Y\)

collider and mediator

Possible a modifier

2

\(X \rightarrow M\)

\(M \leftarrow Y\)

collider

Not a modifier

3

\(X \leftarrow M\)

\(M \rightarrow Y\)

confounder

Possible a modifier

4

\(X \leftarrow M\)

\(M \leftarrow Y\)

N/A

Ill-defined acylic graph

5

\(X \rightarrow M\)

\(M \nleftrightarrow Y\)

collider

Not a modifier

6

\(X \leftarrow M\)

\(M \nleftrightarrow Y\)

not collider/confounder

Not a modifier

7

\(X \nleftrightarrow M\)

\(M \rightarrow Y\)

not collider/confounder

Possible a modifier

8

\(X \nleftrightarrow M\)

\(M \leftarrow Y\)

collider

Not a modifier

9

\(X \nleftrightarrow M\)

\(M \nleftrightarrow Y\)

not collider/confounder

Not a modifier