Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: An evaluation of the EASY instrument in a cross-sectional study

Original Submission
31 Jan 2023 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Jun 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert S. Ware
15 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
19 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 6
19 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Sep 2023 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Sep 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
4 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert S. Ware
6 Oct 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Oct 2023 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 8
25 Oct 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
13 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert S. Ware
21 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 9
21 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 9
24 Nov 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert S. Ware
29 Nov 2023 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 10
29 Nov 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 10
18 Jan 2024 Author responded Author comments - Julie Agel
Resubmission - Version 11
18 Jan 2024 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
19 Jan 2024 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2024 Article published 10.1186/s12874-024-02158-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page