Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Medical Research Methodology

Fig. 2

From: Comparing Bayesian hierarchical meta-regression methods and evaluating the influence of priors for evaluations of surrogate endpoints on heterogeneous collections of clinical trials

Fig. 2

Posterior predictive median and 95% interval are summarized. FP-RE: Full-pooling random effects. PP-RE: Partial-pooling random effects. P1: Diffuse priors used in fitting the PP-RE model. P2: Constrained priors set 1 in fitting the PP-RE model. P3: Constrained priors set 2 (narrowest) in fitting the PP-RE model. Studies listed are described further in Additional file 1. The “ESG” (existing subgroup) studies were used for model fitting. The “NSG” (new subgroup) studies were left-out of model fitting

Back to article page

BMC Medical Research Methodology

ISSN: 1471-2288

Contact us