Characteristics | n or median | % or IQR |
---|---|---|
Rationale for ITS | ||
Did the author give the reason/rationale for using ITS study design? (N = 153) | ||
 Yes | 43 | 28.1 |
Clearly segment time? (N = 153) | ||
 Yes | 153 | 100.0 |
Use of control group (N = 153) | ||
 Yes | 19 | 12.4 |
Type of control (N = 19)a | ||
 Characteristic | 11 | 57.9 |
 Location | 6 | 31.6 |
 Historical | 1 | 5.3 |
 Outcome | 1 | 5.3 |
Data collection and aggregation | ||
Data collection (N = 153) | ||
 Retrospective | 141 | 92.2 |
 Prospective | 12 | 7.8 |
For studies used prospective data, if they have pre-specified protocol? (N = 12) | ||
 Yes | 2 | 16.7 |
Raw data (N = 153) | ||
 Contained individual-level data | 127 | 83.0 |
 Only contained aggregated-level data | 26 | 17.0 |
Analysis unit b (N = 153) | ||
 Aggregated unit | 149 | 97.4 |
 Individual unit | 4 | 2.6 |
Time intervals used for ITS with aggregated unit (N = 149) | ||
 Month | 110 | 73.8 |
 Quarter | 17 | 11.4 |
 Week | 7 | 4.7 |
 Year | 6 | 4.0 |
 Day | 4 | 2.7 |
 Six-month | 2 | 1.3 |
 Two-week | 2 | 1.3 |
 Two-month | 1 | 0.7 |
Number of time points (N = 149)c | 48 | 30, 72 |
Did the author give the rationale for the number of time points? (N = 149) | ||
 Yes | 31 | 20.8 |
The ITS model structure | ||
Type of ITS impact model (N = 153) | ||
 Level and slope change | 139 | 90.8 |
 Level change only | 6 | 3.9 |
 Slope change only | 6 | 3.9 |
 Unclear | 2 | 1.3 |
Did the author give the rationale for using this model? (N = 153) | ||
 Yes | 21 | 13.7 |
Did the author allow for a delay impact? (N = 153) | ||
 Yes | 42 | 27.5 |
Methods of dealing with delay (N = 42)d, e | ||
 Sensitivity | 19 | 45.2 |
 Segment | 11 | 26.2 |
 Excluded | 10 | 23.8 |
 Delay | 6 | 14.3 |
Did the author give the rationale for setting the transition period? (N = 42) | ||
 Yes | 23 | 54.8 |