Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Medical Research Methodology

Fig. 3

From: The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review

Fig. 3

MIDs estimations and 95%CI considering a slight improvement reported by the authors, for MIDs ranging from -150 to +150 points in their respective PROMS. CI: confidence interval; MID: minimal important difference; PFDI: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; PFIQ: Pelvic Floor Impact questionnaire; PGI-I: Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire; UDI: Urogenital Distress Inventory; UIQ: Urinary Impact Questionnaire; VAS: visual analogue scale

Back to article page