Skip to main content

Erratum to: A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design

The Original Article was published on 24 January 2014

Erratum

After publication of the original article [1], the authors noticed an error in Fig. 1. The legend included in the original sub-plot of Fig. 1 was labelled “phi = 500 (p = 25, q = 475)”; however, the figure title suggested phi = 1000.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Various forms of the beta density for varying shape parameters {p,q}. Top left panel: We fix the mean equal to 0.5 and plot the resulting beta densities for varying dispersion parameters. Top right panel: We fix the mean equal to 0.05 and plot the resulting beta densities for varying dispersion parameters. Bottom left panel: We fix the dispersion parameter equal to 100 and plot the resulting beta densities for varying mean parameters. Bottom right panel: We fix the dispersion parameter equal to 5 and plot the resulting beta densities for varying mean parameters

An updated version of Fig. 1 is published in this erratum, where the legend has been updated to “phi = 1000 (p = 50, q = 950)” to be consistent with the figure title.

Reference

  1. Meaney C, Moineddin R. A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:14. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Meaney.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-14.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meaney, C., Moineddin, R. Erratum to: A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design. BMC Med Res Methodol 16, 152 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0256-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0256-6