Digital Science. (2018-) Dimensions [Software]. https://app.dimensions.ai. (2018, accessed 20 July 2020).
Glasziou PP, Sanders S, Hoffmann T. Waste in covid-19 research. BMJ. 2020; 369:m1847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1847.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers. https://retractionwatch.com/retracted-coronavirus-covid-19-papers/. (2020, accessed 20 July 2020).
Yeo-Teh NSL, Tang BL. An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Accountability Res. 2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203. PMID: 32573274.
Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. The Lancet. 2009; 374(9683):86–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9.
Article
Google Scholar
Allen C, Mehler DMA. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(5):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Cockburn A, Dragicevic P, Besançon L, Gutwin C. Threats of a replication crisis in empirical computer science. Commun ACM. 2020; 63(8):70–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360311.
Article
Google Scholar
Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DV, Button KS, Chambers CD, Du Sert NP, Simonsohn U, Wagenmakers E-J, Ware JJ, Ioannidis JP. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017; 1(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
Article
Google Scholar
Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT. The preregistration revolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018; 115(11):2600–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Smaldino PE, Turner MA, Contreras Kallens PA. Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6(7):190194. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190194.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Masuzzo P, Martens L. Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language. PeerJ Preprints. 2017; 5:2689–1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2689v1.
Google Scholar
Watson M. When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’?Genome Biol. 2015; 16(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0669-2.
Article
Google Scholar
Sarabipour S, Debat HJ, Emmott E, Burgess SJ, Schwessinger B, Hensel Z. On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective. PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, The Galaxy Team. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(8):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86.
Article
Google Scholar
Miyakawa T. No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis. Mol Brain. 2020; 13:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Ross-Hellauer T. What is open peer review? a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research. 2017; 6(588). https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2.
Besançon L, Rönnberg N, Löwgren J, Tennant JP, Cooper M. Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020; 5(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Snell L, Spencer J. Reviewers’ perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal. Med Educ. 2005; 39(1):90–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Walsh E, Rooney M, Appleby L, Wilkinson G. Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 176(1):47–51. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.176.1.47.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
COVID-19 resources for librarians, campuses and health professionals (March 24, 2020). https://www.elsevier.com/connect/coronavirus-initiatives. (2020, Accessed 20 April 2021).
Access COVID-19 Content Across Journals, Books, and More. https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/campaigns/coronavirus#c17669228.
Fraser N, Brierley L, Dey G, Polka JK, Pálfy M, Coates JA. Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic. bioRxiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.22.111294.
Pubpeer. 2020. https://pubpeer.com/.
OpenSAFELY. https://opensafely.org/. (2020, accessed July 20, 2020).
Mehra MR, Desai SS, Ruschitzka F, Patel AN. Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of covid-19: a multinational registry analysis. The Lancet. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6.
Wolkewitz M, Puljak L. Methodological challenges of analysing COVID-19 data during the pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(81). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00972-6.
Bik E. Thoughts on the Gautret et al. paper about Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin treatment of COVID-19 infections. 2020. https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2020/03/24/thoughts-on-the-gautret-et-al-paper-about-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-treatment-of-covid-19-infections/.
Rosendaal FR. Review of: “Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial Gautret et al. 2010. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56(1):106063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106063.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Is France’s president fueling the hype over an unproven coronavirus treatment? 2020. https://www.sciencemag.org https: //www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/france-s-president-fueling-hype-over-unproven-coronavirus-treatment. Accessed 20 July 2020.
DeVito NJ, Liu M. COVID-19 Clinical Trials Report Card: Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine. 2020. https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-19-clinical-trials-report-card-chloroquine-and-hydroxychloroquine/.
Geleris J, Sun Y, Platt J, Zucker J, Baldwin M, Hripcsak G, Labella A, Manson DK, Kubin C, Barr RG, Sobieszczyk ME, Schluger NW. Observational study of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(25):2411–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2012410.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ledford H. Coronavirus shuts down trials of drugs for multiple other diseases. Nature. 2020; 580(7801):15–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00889-6.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gautret P, Lagier J-C, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Vieira VE, Tissot Dupont H, Honoré S, Colson P, Chabrière E, La Scola B, Rolain J-M, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56(1):105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Xafis V, Schaefer GO, Labude MK, Zhu Y, Hsu LY. The perfect moral storm: Diverse ethical considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020; 46(12):803–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00125-3.
Google Scholar
Nguyen LS, Dolladille C, Drici M-D, Fenioux C, Alexandre J, Mira J-P, Moslehi JJ, Roden DM, Funck-Brentano C, Salem J-E. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Circulation. 2020; 142(3):303–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048238.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bramstedt KA. The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality. J Med Ethics. 2020; 46:803–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106494.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Why Should I Register and Submit Results. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/manage-recs/background. Accessed 20 July 2020.
Cockburn A, Gutwin C, Dix A. Hark no more: On the preregistration of chi experiments. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ’18. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 2018. p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173715.
Google Scholar
Reveiz L, Cortés-Jofré M, Asenjo Lobos C, Nicita G, Ciapponi A, Garcìa-Dieguez M, Tellez D, Delgado M, Solà I, Ospina E. Influence of trial registration on reporting quality of randomized trials: Study from highest ranked journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(11):1216–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.013.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dodd LE, Follmann D, Wang J, Koenig F, Korn LL, Schoergenhofer C, Proschan M, Hunsberger S, Bonnett T, Makowski M, Belhadi D, Wang Y, Cao B, Mentre F, Jaki T. Endpoints for randomized controlled clinical trials for COVID-19 treatments. Clin Trials. 2020; 17(5):472–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520939938.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wagenmakers E-J, Dutilh G, Sarafoglou A. The creativity-verification cycle in psychological science: New methods to combat old idols. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018; 13(4):418–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618771357. PMID: 29961413.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wiseman R, Watt C, Kornbrot D. Registered reports: an early example and analysis. PeerJ. 2019; 7:6232. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6232.
Article
Google Scholar
Chambers CD, Feredoes E, Muthukumaraswamy SD, Etchells P. Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered reports at aims neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neurosci. 2014; 1(1):4–17. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience2014.1.4.
Article
Google Scholar
Bandrowski A, Brush M, Grethe JS, Haendel MA, Kennedy DN, Hill S, Hof PR, Martone ME, Pols M, Tan SC, Washington N, Zudilova-Seinstra E, Vasilevsky N. The resource identification initiative: A cultural shift in publishing. J Comp Neurol. 2016; 524(1):8–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23913.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. Consort 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010; 340. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332.
Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007; 335(7624):806–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD.
Article
Google Scholar
Society TR. Urgent Call for Registered Reports on Coronavirus. https://royalsociety.org/blog/2020/03/urgent-call-for-registered-reports-on-coronavirus/. (2020, accessed 20 July 2021).
LeBlanc AG, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Tremblay MS, Chaput J-P. Scientific sinkhole: The pernicious price of formatting. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14(9):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223116.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016; 533(7604):452–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pain E. Meet Octopus, a new vision for scientific publishing. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2018/11/meet-octopus-new-vision-scientific-publishing. Accessed 20 July 2020.
Palayew A, Norgaard O, Safreed-Harmon K, Andersen TH, Rasmussen LN, Lazarus JV. Pandemic publishing poses a new covid-19 challenge. Nat Hum Behav. 2020:666–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0.
Pederson T. Publishing coronavirology: Peering into peer(less?) review. FASEB J. 2020; 34(8):9825–7. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202001592.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Journal of Critical Care, COVID-19 Update. Elsevier. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-critical-care/covid-19. Accessed 20 July 2020.
COVID-19 Articles Accepted for Fast-Track Publication in Psychological Science. Psychological Science. SAGE. https://journals.sagepub.com/page/pss/covid-19. Accessed 20 July 2020.
Full fee waivers and fast-track peer review for COVID-19-related manuscripts across all PeerJ journals. https://peerj.com/blog/post/115284882180/covid-19-full-fee-waivers-fast-track-peer-review/. Accessed 20 July 2020.
The MIT Press and UC Berkeley launch Rapid Reviews: COVID-19. 2020. https://rapidreviewscovid19.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/press-release.
Homolak J, Kodvanj I, Virag D. Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders. Scientometrics. 2020; 124:2687–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03587-2.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Aviv A. Telomeres and COVID-19. FASEB J. 2020; 34(6):7247–52. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202001025.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Committee on Publication Ethics. A short guide to ethical editing for new editors. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.8. https://publicationethics.org/node/19871.
Risch HA. Opinion: Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk Covid-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis. Am J Epidemiol. 2020; 189(11):1218–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa093.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fox MP, D’Agostino McGowan L, James BD, Lessler J, Mehta SH, Murray EJ. Concerns About the Special Article on Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in High Risk Outpatients with COVID-19 by Dr. Harvey Risch. Am J Epidemiol. 2021; 190(4):491–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa189.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Machiels JD, Bleeker-Rovers CP, ter Heine R, Rahamat-Langendoen J, de Mast Q, ten Oever J, Bousema T, van Crevel R, Wertheim HF. Reply to Gautret et al.: hydroxychloroquine sulfate and azithromycin for COVID-19: what is the evidence and what are the risks?Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56(1):106056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106056.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Voss A, Coombs G, Unal S, Saginur R, Hsueh P-R. Publishing in face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56(1):106081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106081.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Mehra MR, Desai SS, Kuy S, Henry TD, Patel AN. Retraction: Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(26):2582. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2021225.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. “Solidarity” clinical trial for COVID-19 treatments. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/solidarity-clinical-trial-for-covid-19-treatments. (2020, accessed 20 July 2021).
Mahase E. Covid-19: WHO halts hydroxychloroquine trial to review links with increased mortality risk. BMJ. 2020; 369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2126.
Hardwicke TE, Goodman SN. How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? the results of a survey. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15(10):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239598.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
The BMJ Editorial Board. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/editorial-staff. (Accessed 15 July 2020).
Horbach SPJM, W H. The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications. Scientometrics. 2019; 118(1):339–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2969-2.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pardo R, Algara M, Montero-Fernández MA, Sanz X, Vernet M, Rodríguez N, Andrés-Luna R, Piñero A, Ciérvide R, Córdoba R, et al.Diagnosis and locoregional treatment of patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria. 2020; 33(2):61–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.senol.2020.04.002.
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zenodo. 2020. https://zenodo.org/.
ASAPbio. 2020. https://asapbio.org/.
Review Commons. 2020. https://www.reviewcommons.org/about/.
OutbreakScience PREreview. 2020. https://outbreaksci.prereview.org/.
Morris T, Dahly D, Hood K, Gates S. Statistical review of Effect of Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 – Preliminary Report. Zenodo. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3928540.
Bik E. Post-publication-reviews-on-covid-19-papers. https://scienceintegritydigest.com/2020/03/27/post-publication-reviews-on-covid-19-papers/?.
Pucker B, Schilbert HM, Schumacher SF. Integrating Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Education. J Integr Bioinforma. 2019; 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/jib-2019-0005.
Jansen Y, Hornbaek K, Dragicevic P. What Did Authors Value in the CHI’16 Reviews They Received? In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 2016. p. 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892576.
Squazzoni F, Grimaldo F, Marušić A. Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data. Nature. 2017; 546:352.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
McNutt M. Journals unite for reproducibility. Nature. 2014; 515:7. https://doi.org/10.1038/515007a.
Google Scholar
Nichols TE, Das S, Eickhoff SB, Evans AC, Glatard T, Hanke M, Kriegeskorte N, Milham MP, Poldrack RA, Poline J-B, Proal E, Thirion B, Van Essen DC, White T, Yeo B. Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(3):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Blumzon CFI, Pănescu AT. Data Storage. Cham: Springer; 2020, pp. 277–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/164\_2019\_28.
Google Scholar
Peiffer-Smadja N, Maatoug R, Lescure F-X, D’Ortenzio E, Pineau J, King J-R. Machine learning for COVID-19 needs global collaboration and data-sharing. Nat Mach Intell. 2020; 2:293–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0181-6.
Article
Google Scholar
Asendorpf JB, Conner M, De Fruyt F, De Houwer J, Denissen JJA, Fiedler K, Fiedler S, Funder DC, Kliegl R, Nosek BA, Perugini M, Roberts BW, Schmitt M, van Aken MAG, Weber H, Wicherts JM. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. Eur J Personal. 2013; 27(2):108–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919.
Article
Google Scholar
Begley CG, Ioannidis JP. Reproducibility in science: improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circ Res. 2015; 116(1):116–26. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? a systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE. 2009; 4(5):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li R, von Isenburg M, Levenstein M, Neumann S, Wood J, Sim I. Covid-19 trials: declarations of data sharing intentions at trial registration and at publication. Trials. 2021; 22(153). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05104-z.
Johnson AE, Pollard TJ, Shen L, Li-Wei HL, Feng M, Ghassemi M, Moody B, Szolovits P, Celi LA, Mark RG. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. BSci data. 2016; 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.35.
Easterbrook SM. Open code for open science?Nat Geosci. 2014; 7(11):779–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Johnson AE, Stone DJ, Celi LA, Pollard TJ. The MIMIC Code Repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 25(1):32–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx084.
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gilroy SP, Kaplan BA. Furthering open science in behavior analysis: An introduction and tutorial for using GitHub in research. Perspect Behav Sci. 2019; 42(3):565–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00202-5.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Perkel J. Democratic databases: science on GitHub. Nature. 2016; 538(7623):127–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/538127a.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wiley’s Data Sharing Policies. https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/open-access/data-sharing-citation/data-sharing-policy. html. (Accessed 15 July 2020).
Murcott THL, Williams A. The challenges for science journalism in the UK. Prog Phys Geogr: Earth Environ. 2013; 37(2):152–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312471285.
Article
Google Scholar
Johansson MA, Reich NG, Meyers LA, Lipsitch M. Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(4):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002549.
Article
Google Scholar
Fry NK, Marshall H, Mellins-Cohen T. In praise of preprints. Microb Genomics. 2019; 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.000259.
Kwon D. How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01394-6.
Polka JK, Penfold NC. Biomedical preprints per month, by source and as a fraction of total literature. Zenodo. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3819276.
Johansson MA, Reich NG, Meyers LA, Lipsitch M. Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science. PLoS Med. 2018; 15(4):1002549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002549.
Article
Google Scholar
Abdill RJ, Blekhman R. Meta-Research: Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints. eLife. 2019; 8:45133. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.45133.
Article
Google Scholar
Fraser N, Brierley L, Dey G, Polka JK, Pálfy M, Nanni F, et al.The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape. PLoS Biol. 2021; 19(4):e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gautret P, Lagier J-C, Parola P, Hoang VT, Medded L, Mailhe M, Doudier B, Courjon J, Giordanengo V, Esteves Vieira V, Tissot Dupont H, Honoré S, Colson P, Chabrière E, La Scola B, Rolain J-M, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020; 56(1):105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Sattui SE, Liew JW, Graef ER, Coler-Reilly A, Berenbaum F, Duarte-García A, Harrison C, Konig MF, Korsten P, Putman MS, Robinson PC, Sirotich E, Ugarte-Gil MF, Webb K, Young KJ, Kim AHJ, Sparks JA. Swinging the pendulum: lessons learned from public discourse concerning hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020; 16(7):659–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2020.1792778. PMID: 32620062.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bae S, Kim MC, Kim JY, Cha HH, Lim JS, Jung J, Kim MJ, Oh DK, Lee M-K, Choi S-H, Sung M, Hong SB, Chung JW, Kim SH. Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS–CoV-2: a controlled comparison in 4 patients. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 173(1):22–3. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-1342. PMID: 32251511.
Article
Google Scholar
Williams A, Clifford S. Mapping the field: A political economic account of specialist science news journalism in the UK national media. ORCA: Online Research at Cardiff. 2008.
Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Andrews A, Stukel TA. Influence of medical journal press releases on the quality of associated newspaper coverage: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8164.
Sumner P, Vivian-Griffiths S, Boivin J, Williams A, Venetis CA, Davies A, Ogden J, Whelan L, Hughes B, Dalton B, Boy F, Chambers CD. The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study. BMJ. 2014; 349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7015.
Sumner P, Vivian-Griffiths S, Boivin J, Williams A, Bott L, Adams R, Venetis CA, Whelan L, Hughes B, Chambers CD. Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(12):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168217.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sheldon T. Preprints could promote confusion and distortion. Nature. 2018; 559(7714):445–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05789-4.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dumas-Mallet E, Smith A, Boraud T, Gonon F. Scientific uncertainty in the press: How newspapers describe initial biomedical findings. Sci Commun. 2018; 40(1):124–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017752166.
Article
Google Scholar
Meier K, Schützeneder J. Bridging the gaps: Transfer between scholarly research and newsrooms in journalism education–toward an evidence-based practice in an age of post-truth and state of flux. Journal Mass Commun Educ. 2019; 74(2):199–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695819830021.
Article
Google Scholar
Miranda GF, Vercellesi L, Bruno F. Information sources in biomedical science and medical journalism: methodological approaches and assessment. Pharmacol Res. 2004; 50(3):267–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2003.12.021.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peláez AL, Díaz JA. Science, technology and democracy: Perspectives about the complex relation between the scientific community, the scientific journalist and public opinion. Soc Epistemol. 2007; 21(1):55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720601125548.
Article
Google Scholar
Chalaud D, Aghan D, Otindo V, Bennett A, Baldet T. Ebola: improving science-based communication and local journalism. Lancet. 2015; 386(10009):2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01047-8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
La V-P, Pham T-H, Ho M-T, Nguyen M-H, P Nguyen K-L, Vuong T-T, Nguyen H-KT, Tran T, Khuc Q, Ho M-T, Vuong Q-H. Policy response, social media science journalism for the sustainability of the public health system amid the COVID-19 outbreak: the Vietnam lessons. Sustainability. 2020; 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072931.
Science Media Centre. 2020. https://www.sciencemediacentre.org/. Accessed 20 July 2020.
Scientific journalism on COVID-19 time. 2020. https://en.unesco.org/events/scientific-journalism-covid-19-time.
Smeros P, Castillo C, Aberer K. Scilens: Evaluating the quality of scientific news articles using social media and scientific literature indicators. In: The World Wide Web Conference WWW ’19. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 2019. p. 1747–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313657.
Google Scholar
Science Integrity Digest. 2020. https://scienceintegritydigest.com/.
Kennedy B, Hefferon M. What americans know about science: Science knowledge levels remain strongly tied to education; republicans and democrats are about equally knowledgeable. Pew Research Center. 2019.
Vraga EK, Tully M, Bode L. Empowering users to respond to misinformation about COVID-19. Media Commun. 2020; 8(2):475–9. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3200.
Article
Google Scholar
Masuzzo P, Besançon L, Tennant J. It is time to fix research evaluation. 2019. https://opensciencemooc.eu/evaluation/2019/10/15/solve-research-evaluation/. Accessed 20 Apr 2021.
Nosek BA, Spies JR, Motyl M. Scientific utopia: II. restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012; 7(6):615–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barrett LF. The publication arms race. APS Observer. 2019; 32(7). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-publications-arms-race. Accessed 20 July 2020.
Jeschke JM, Lokatis S, Bartram I, Tockner K. Knowledge in the dark: scientific challenges and ways forward. FACETS. 2019; 4(1):423–41. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0007.
Article
Google Scholar
Crous CJ. The darker side of quantitative academic performance metrics. S Afr J Sci. 2019; 115:1–3. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/5785.
Article
Google Scholar
Lawrence PA. The mismeasurement of science. Curr Biol. 2007; 17(15):583–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.014.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
American Society for Cell Biology. DORA. Declaration on Research Assessment. 2012. https://sfdora.org/read/. Accessed 20 July 2020.
Kowalczyk O, Lautarescu A, Blok E, Dall’Aglio L, Westwood SJ. What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-step guide. PsyArXiv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jyfr7.
Sarewitz D. Saving Science. 2020. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/saving-science.
Thorp HH. Science has always been political. Science. 2020; 369(6501):227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd7628.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kickbusch I. Politics or technocracy – what next for global health?; comment on navigating between stealth advocacy and unconscious dogmatism: The challenge of researching the norms, politics and power of global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016; 5(3):201–4. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.209.
Article
Google Scholar