Skip to main content

Modeling heart rate of individual and team manual handling with one hand using generalized additive mixed models

Abstract

Objectives

Despite the fact that team manual handling is common in different working environments, the previous studies in this regard, particularly those with a physiological approach are quite limited. The present study is an attempt to model the heart rate (HR) of individual and team manual handling with one hand.

Methods

Twenty-five young men (aged 21.24±1.42 year) volunteered for this study. The experiments included individual and two-person handling of the load with three different weights with and without height difference. The participants’ HR was registered at the end of the route by a chest-strap pulse monitor and a polar watch according to the manufacturer's recommendation. A multivariate Generalized Additive Mixed Model (MGAMM) was used for modeling heart rate based on explanatory variables of workload, carry method, HRrest, body weight, height, knee height, shoulder height, elbow height, and hand height. The significance level of the tests was considered as <0.05.

Results

Based on the MGAMM, the average HR (bpm) of participants increased as the workload increased (P<0.001). Handling the load with a taller person increased the HR compared to shorter partner (P<0.001). Moreover, the nonlinear associations of the resting HR (P<0.001), body weight (P<0.001), height (P<0.001), and the height of elbow, hand and knee (P<0.001) were statistically significant. The adjusted R2 of the model was 0.89 indicating that about 90 percent of the variations observed in HR could be explained by the variables in the model. This was greater than the model considering only linear effects (R2 =0.60).

Conclusion

The model obtained in this study can predict the heart rate of individual and team one-handed handling with high validity. The MGAMM can be used in modeling heart rate in manual handling.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Manual materials handling is one of the main causes of fatigue and reduced performance in many workplaces. Researchers have always sought appropriate strategies to mitigate these consequences [1,2,3]. In terms of the number of people involved in handling a load, MMH can be individual or team-based. In various industrial, military, construction, medical, and agricultural environments, when the weight of the load exceeds the capacity of an individual or is large in size, and it is not feasible for the person to lift or carry the load using mechanical equipment, the team steps in to move the load [4,5,6,7,8]. Team manual handling is a method of manual handling in which the materials are moved through tasks such as lifting, carrying, lowering, pushing, and pulling by two or more persons.

Two-person handling is one of the common methods of team manual handling that can be performed with one or two hand (s). When using two hands in tandem or parallel, each method has its specific a particular shortcoming. In tandem, where two workers carry a load with two hands, they cannot see obstacles on the path, posing a high safety risk of falling due to the inability to detect obstacles. Additionally, based on previous findings, two-person handling in parallel is considered difficult by workers [3]. Consequently, team members may choose to carry the load with one hand on the unilateral side of their body.

Based on the current knowledge, despite team manual handling being common in various working environments, studies in this regard, especially those with a physiological approach, are limited [9]. The few studies in this area have been focused on measuring heart rate (HR) in team manual handling using two hands [3, 10, 11]. For instance, Wu and Chung examined the effects of carrying methods (parallel and tandem) with and without box handles on heart rate during a two-person carrying task (two-hands setting), involving 16 female participants [3]. Additionally, Visser et al conducted an observational study evaluating team lifting on work demands and workload (measured by as the percentage of heart rate reserve) among ironworkers [11]. Based on the results of a recent systematic review study by the authors of this study [9], there are no studies examining the physiological parameters of the body in team manual handling with one hand. Furthermore, the impact of variables such as load weight, body weight, team members’ height difference, and body dimensions on these parameters has not been explored. Previous studies have indicated that these variables affect physiological parameters in individual manual handling [12,13,14,15,16]. It is anticipated that these variables will similarly influence the physiological parameters of the body in team manual handling with one hand. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of investigating these influences and modeling the heart rate during both individual and team manual handling with one hand. To achieve this, we employed the multivariate generalized additive mixed model (MGAMM) as a state-of-the-art and advanced statistical model to capture the correct functional form of the variables in the model.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

Twenty-five men volunteered for this study. The experiments were conducted based on the protocol approved by the ethics committee of the university. Before the experiments, the participants were briefed on the study's purpose, and written consent was obtained from them. The inclusion criteria comprised men with an age range of 20-25 years who volunteered to participate, while the exclusion criteria encompassed a history of drug use, smoking, accidents, surgery, or respiratory, musculoskeletal, and cardiovascular diseases.

Experiment procedure

The participants received the required instructions 72 hours before the load carriage experiments. They were instructed to have their breakfast at least two hours before the experiment and were asked not to engage in heavy exercises one day before. Participants wore light cotton clothes and sports shoes. Before each experiment, their resting heart rate (HRrest) was measured.

The load carriage experiments involved individual and two-person handling of loads with three different weights, using the dominant hand on the unilateral side of the body. This process included lifting from knuckle height, carrying in a 30-meter route with a slope of 0° and a step rate of 100 steps/min, and lowering at knuckle height. The step rate was regulated by a metronome. Walking time in each experiment was measured with a chronometer. If any unwanted delay occurred during the route, such as stopping or not syncing with metronome beat, the experiment was repeated. In individual handling, the load weights were 3.5, 7, and 10.5 kg. The highest load weight was determined based on the findings of previous studies [17,18,19]. The light and heavy weights were selected with proportional weight intervals.

Two-person handling also involved managing loads with three different weights: 7, 14, and 21 kg (twice the weight used in individual handling), following the same route with the mentioned features. As a result, each person's share of the weight during team handling equaled their share in individual handling. In this stage, evaluation was conducted for only one of the team members.

For a more thorough examination of the impact of the team members’ height difference on their heart rate, three individuals with approximately the same height, about 12 cm taller, and about 12 cm shorter than the person under examination were included to assist in handling the load. Consequently, the number of experiments in the team handling stage was 9.

The sequence for all the mentioned experiments was selected randomly. Between every two experiments, each participant rested sitting for 10 minutes to allow their heart rate to return to resting levels (HRrest). All experiments took place in a controlled laboratory setting with a temperature range of 20-23°C and a relative humidity of 35-40%. The temperature and humidity were regulated by an air conditioning system.

The load used for individual handling included a box with dimensions of 40×16×30 cm (length × width × height) and a handle diameter of 3 cm. The load used for two-person handling was a box with dimensions of 70×40×30 cm and handles diameter of 3 cm. These boxes were designed to resemble industrial boxes. The weights inside the boxes were arranged to ensure equal distribution throughout the box. Participants' heart rate was recorded at the end of the route. To measure their HR during the experiments, a chest-strap pulse monitor and a watch (A300; Polar Electro Oy; Finland) were utilized.

Statistical analyses

A repeated measurement test was employed to compare the average heart rate between different handling methods. A graph with error bars was used to illustrate the variables. A generalized additive mixed model was utilized for modeling heart rate. Let \({y}_{im}\) denote the heart rate of the \(i\) th individual (\(i=\mathrm{1,2},\dots ,n\) ) for the carry method (\(m=\mathrm{1,2},\mathrm{3,4}\)) and let \({x}_{i}^{T}=\left(1,{x}_{i1},\dots ,{x}_{ip}\right)\)be the covariate vector associated with subject \(i\) (here, including body weight, height, knee height, shoulder height, elbow height, and hand height). Also, let \({\eta }_{m}\)be the random effect for the \(i\) th individual (here each individual creates a cluster) and \({\varepsilon }_{im}\) be the random error term (normally distributed). To consider the nonlinear relationship between HR and the continuous variables in the model, a semi-parametric model including both parametric and non-parametric components was used as follows:

$$y_{im}=\alpha+\beta_{wl}\times workload+\beta_{HS}\times Handlig\_states+\sum_{k=1}^Kf\left(x_{ik}\right)+\eta_m+\varepsilon_{im}$$

where,\(f\left({x}_{ik}\right)\) indicates a smooth function of anthropometric variables and resting heart rate, \(\alpha\) is a constant term (intercept) and \({\beta }_{wl}\) and \({\beta }_{HS}\) are two vectors consisting of the dummy variables for workload (3.5 (Reference category)), 7 and 10.5 kg) and handling states levels (individual, same height, taller and shorter (Reference category)). In this study we used cubic spline method to estimate the functional form of \(f\left({x}_{ik}\right)\) s. All the analyses were done on the R v.4.1.2. package “mgcv”and the differences were considered as statistically significant at P<0.05. The normality assumption was checked using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The null hypothesis was “the normality assumption holds”.

Results

Statistics

The mean and standard deviation related to the participants’ age were 21.24±1.42 years (age range 20–25 years), 67.16±9.34 kg for their weight, and 21.63±2.35 for their body mass index. According to their statements, all the subjects were right-handed. Anthropometric dimensions of participants are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Anthropometric dimensions of the participants in cm

Based on the length of the load-carrying route and the duration of the walking, the participants’ walking speed in each experiment was calculated. The results showed no significant difference in the walking speed among the participants during the 12 experiments (p > 0.05). The mean score and standard deviation related to the participants’ walking speed were found to be 1.10±0.05 m/s.

Comparison of the average heart rate in various settings

The mean and standard deviation related to the participants’ resting heart rate (HR rest) was 69.96±4.63 bpm. Table 2 presents the participants’ heart rate in different states of individual and team handling with various weights. It should be noted that as each person’s share of the weight in two-person handling was equal to their share in individual handling, the load weights in the table and figure are the same as those in individual handling. In all states of handling, following an increase in the load weight, heart rate also increased; this increase was significant in all these states (P < 0.05). Furthermore, some differences were found between individual and team handling, especially when the team members were not of the same height. Some of these differences were significant. Figure 1 illustrates these differences.

Table 2 Comparing the mean related to participants’ heart rate (bpm) for different weights and states of handling
Fig. 1
figure 1

The effect of load weight and handling states on the participants’ HR (bpm)

Multivariate generalized additive mixed model of heart rate

Table 3 shows the results of the multivariate generalized additive mixed model in modeling heart rate based on variables such as workload, carry method, resting heart rate (HRrest), body weight, height, knee height, shoulder height, elbow height, and hand height. The first part of the table illustrates the association between workload and handling states.

Table 3 The results of the Generalized Additive Mixed Model in modeling heart rate

As observed, the associations were highly significant, such that an increase in workload from 3.5 to 7 kg was related to an average heart rate increase of about 3.5. Additionally, increasing the workload from 3.5 to 10.5 kg was associated with an average heart rate increase of about 8.5.

Moreover, the carry method was significantly associated with an increase in heart rate. For instance, the heart rate increased by 4.5 for taller members compared to shorter members on average, when other variables were held constant. The lower part of Table 3 indicates the p-values for the nonlinear effects. As shown, all variables were nonlinearly associated with heart rate. The functional forms of the relationships are depicted in Fig. 2

Fig. 2
figure 2

The relationship between HRrest, body weight and anthropometric dimensions with heart rate. Note: The numbers of the vertical axis indicate the estimated degree of freedom

The adjusted R2 was 0.889, indicating that about 90 percent of the variations observed in heart rate could be explained by the variables in the model, which was greater than the model with a linear assumption of the relationships (R2 was about 0.6).

The goodness of fit of the model was visually checked using the “mgcv” package. The results are shown in Fig. 3 According to the plots, there was a strong association between observed heart rate (HR) and fitted values using GAMM. Also, no serious violations of the normality of residuals were observed (results not shown). We also used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to check the normality of the residuals. The results showed that there was no evidence of a violation of normality for the residuals (p > 0.05)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Observed response vs. fitted values using GAMM

Discussion

The present study aimed to examine the effect of load weight, handling method, team members’ height difference, and body dimensions on heart rate in both individual and team one-handed handling. The analysis of the effect of load weight on the participants' heart rate indicated that as the load weight increased in all methods of individual and team handling, the participants' heart rate also increased. Previous studies on individual handling have also reported a significant effect of load weight on increasing heart rate [20,21,22,23].

In the current study, the effect of the participants' height difference on the heart rate of team members during carrying was also examined. The results showed that the height difference between team members can have a significant effect on these responses. When the height of the participant in team handling is greater than that of the person assisting with handling the load, their mean HR was higher, and when their height is shorter, the mean score related to these responses is lower. These differences were significant in all three load weights (P <0.05). Compared to the same-height condition, when the participant’s height was higher, a significant difference was observed in HR in the third load weight (P <0.001).

The findings of the present study suggest that in two-person handling, when there is a height difference between team members, the taller person physiologically experiences more stress and is at a higher risk of injury. There are no similar studies on the effect of the height differences of team members on their physiological parameters

In the present study, for a more careful examination of the effect of individual and team handling on the participants' heart rate, the load weight for two-person handling was two times higher than in individual handling. Therefore, each person’s share of the load weight in team handling was equal to their share in individual handling. Based on the findings, when there was no height difference between team members, the mean scores related to heart rate were different across the three weight conditions; these responses were slightly smaller in the team handling state compared to individual handling, but none of these differences was significant. In the study by Wu et al. [3]. in which there was no considerable difference in the team members’ height, the difference in heart rate between individual and team handling was not significant.

In previous studies, the maximum weight recommended for continuous handling tasks with one hand for men has been 10 kg to ensure that heart rate (HR) does not exceed 100 bpm [17,18,19, 24]. The results of the present study showed that the mean HR of the participants did not exceed the recommended value, except for taller members in team handling with the third load weight, where the obtained result was slightly higher than the recommended limit.

The model presented in this article has high validity and demonstrates non-linear relationships between heart rate and the investigated variables. The presented diagrams illustrate the details of these non-linear relationships. Some relationships closely resemble a linear pattern, while others are entirely non-linear. Some previous studies assumed a linear relationship between heart rate and variables such as anthropometric parameters, providing a predictive model based on the covariates in the model [25, 26]. Ismaila et al showed that there is a non-linear relationship between HR at work and demographic variables [27]. The connections between subjects’ characteristics and HR may be non-linear. Considering a linear relationship may lead to biased estimates of the true effects of variables in the model and, consequently, provide erroneous predictions. The results of the present study are more similar to the results of Ismaila et al.

Strengths and Limitations

In the current study, for a more careful examination of the effect of load weight and handling method on heart rate (HR), an attempt was made to maintain a fixed walking speed as much as possible. This was achieved by using a metronome that regulated a consistent stepping rate during the 12 experiments. The decision to use a metronome aimed to ensure a fixed walking speed, as previous studies using a treadmill have been associated with overestimation of physiological responses [28, 29]. Employing this method was an effort to avoid the occurrence of this error, which represented a strength compared to previous studies.

This study specifically focused on heart rate during two-person handling in a laboratory setting with young participants. Future studies could further investigate these responses in larger teams, incorporating members from different age groups, within a real workplace.

Conclusions

So far, the few studies focused on team handling have been limited to team handling with two hands, and team handling with one hand has not been addressed. The present study focused on this method of manual handling. The model obtained in this study for the prediction of HR while manual handling can predict the heart rate of individual and team one-handed handling with high validity. The Generalized Additive Mixed Model can be used in modeling heart rate in manual materials handling.

Availability of data and materials

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Paul S, Bhattacharyya D, Chatterjee T, Pal MS, Majumdar D, Singh SN, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses during incremental uphill load carriage. Int J Ind Ergon. 2015;50:26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pal M, Yadav A, Arya K, Chatterjee T, Bhattacharyya D, Kumar B. Optimization of load carriage at desert environment. Int J Ind Ergon. 2020;79: 102986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu S-P, Chang S-Y. Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(4):615–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson SL, Lewis DM. A Psychophysical Study of Two-Person Manual Material Handling Tasks. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting. 1989;33(11):651–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharp M, Rice V, Nindl B, Williamson T. Maximum Lifting Capacity in Single and Mixed Gender Three-Person Teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 1993;37(10):725–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marras WS, Davis KG, Kirking BC, Granata KP. Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting. Ergonomics. 1999;42(10):1258–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daynard D, Yassi A, Cooper JE, Tate R, Norman R, Wells R. Biomechanical analysis of peak and cumulative spinal loads during simulated patient-handling activities: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial to prevent lift and transfer injury of health care workers. Appl Ergon. 2001;32(3):199–214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett RS, Dennis GJ. Ergonomic issues in team lifting. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 2005;15(3):293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heidari moghaddam R, Anbarian M, Ilbeigi S, Tapak L, Hosseini MH. Team manual handling: A systematic review for identifying research gaps. Int J Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2021;28(3):1461–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1902136.

  10. Mital A, Motorwala A. An ergonomic evaluation of steel and composite access covers. Int J Ind Ergon. 1995;15(4):285–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Visser S, van der Molen HF, Kuijer PPFM, Hoozemans MJM, Frings-Dresen MHW. Evaluation of team lifting on work demands, workload and workers’ evaluation: An observational field study. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(6):1597–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pandorf CE, Harman EA, Frykman PN, Patton JF, Mello RP, Nindl BC. Correlates of load carriage and obstacle course performance among women. Work. 2002;18:179–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bastien GJ, Willems PA, Schepens B, Heglund NC. Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94(1):76–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyons J, Allsopp A, Bilzon J. Influences of body composition upon the relative metabolic and cardiovascular demands of load-carriage. Occup Med. 2005;55(5):380–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma R, Kamboj K, Bhardwaj J. Gender response and safe carrying load limit for sugar industry workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;25(1):51–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Badawy M, Schall MC, Sesek RF, Gallagher S, Davis GA, Capanoglu MF. One-handed carrying among elderly and obese individuals: a systematic review to identify research gaps. Ergonomics. 2018;61(10):1345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kilbom Å, Hägg GM, Käll C. One-handed load carrying — Cardiovascular, muscular and subjective indices of endurance and fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1992;65(1):52–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lind A, McNicol G. Cardiovascular responses to holding and carrying weights by hand and by shoulder harness. J Appl Physiol. 1968;25(3):261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mital A. Preliminary guidelines for designing one-handed material handling tasks. J Occup Accid. 1985;7(1):33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Datta SR, Chatterjee BB, Roy BN. The Relationship between Energy Expenditure and Pulse Rates with Body Weight and the Load Carried During Load Carrying on the Level. Ergonomics. 1973;16(4):507–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Taboun SM, Dutta SP. Energy cost models for combined lifting and carrying tasks. Int J Ind Ergon. 1989;4(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mital A, Manivasagan I. Subjective estimates of one-handed carrying tasks. Appl Ergon. 1983;14(4):265–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee T-H, Tseng C-Y. Grip Force and Heart Rate Responses to Manual Carrying Tasks: Effects of Material, Weight, and Base Area of the Container. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(3):377–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ganguli S, Datta SR. Studies in load carrying in BK amputees with a PTB prosthesis system. J Med Eng Technol. 1977;1(3):151–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morrissey SJ, Liou YH. Metabolic costs of load carriage with different container sizes. Ergonomics. 1984;27(8):847–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liou YH, Morrissey SJ. Predicting male and female physiological costs of load carriage. Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1985:633–9.

  27. Ismaila SO, Oriolowo KT, Akanbi OG. Predicting relative and working heart rates of bricklaying jobs using neural network. Occup Ergon. 2013;11(1):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vickery-Howe DM, Drain JR, Clarke AC, Dascombe BJ, McWilliam JT, Middleton KJ. Treadmill load carriage overestimates energy expenditure of overground load carriage. Ergonomics. 2021;64(4):521–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dal U, Erdogan T, Resitoglu B, Beydagi H. Determination of preferred walking speed on treadmill may lead to high oxygen cost on treadmill walking. Gait Posture. 2010;31(3):366–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

These results were obtained as part of a Ph.D. thesis in ergonomics. We would like to appreciate the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for approval and financial support of this study.

Funding

The Vice-Chancellor of Research and Technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences funded this study (Grant NO: 9811088453)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.H.H., R.H.M., and L.T. conceived and designed the study. M.H.H. and R.H.M. collected the data. L.T. analyzed the data. M.H.H. and L.T. drafted the initial version of the manuscript. All authors, including M.H.H., R.H.M., L.T., S.I., and M.A., provided critical revisions to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leili Tapak.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.UMSHA.REC.1398.825). Informed written consent was obtained from the participants. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection as well as in writing the manuscript. All participants received an informed written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, M.H., Heidarimoghaddam, R., Anbarian, M. et al. Modeling heart rate of individual and team manual handling with one hand using generalized additive mixed models. BMC Med Res Methodol 24, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02169-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02169-7

Keywords