Curran-Everett D: Explorations in statistics: hypothesis tests and P values. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009, 33: 81-86. 10.1152/advan.90218.2008.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Fisher RA: Statistical Methods for Research Workers. 1925, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd

Google Scholar

Neyman J, Pearson E: On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference. Biometrika. 1928, 20: 175-240.

Google Scholar

Silva LC: Los laberintos de la investigación biomédica. En defensa de la racionalidad para la ciencia del siglo XXI. 2009, Madrid: Díaz de Santos

Google Scholar

Berkson J: Test of significance considered as evidence. J Am Stat Assoc. 1942, 37: 325-335. 10.2307/2279000.

Article
Google Scholar

Nickerson RS: Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychol Methods. 2000, 5: 241-301. 10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.241.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Rozeboom WW: The fallacy of the null hypothesissignificance test. Psychol Bull. 1960, 57: 418-428. 10.1037/h0042040.

Article
Google Scholar

Callahan JL, Reio TG: Making subjective judgments in quantitative studies: The importance of using effect sizes and confidenceintervals. HRD Quarterly. 2006, 17: 159-173.

Google Scholar

Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC: Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev. 2007, 82: 591-605. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Breaugh JA: Effect size estimation: factors to consider and mistakes to avoid. J Manage. 2003, 29: 79-97. 10.1177/014920630302900106.

Google Scholar

Thompson B: What future quantitative social science research could look like: confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educ Res. 2002, 31: 25-32.

Article
Google Scholar

Matthews RA: Significance levels for the assessment of anomalous phenomena. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 1999, 13: 1-7.

Google Scholar

Savage IR: Nonparametric statistics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1957, 52: 332-333.

Google Scholar

Silva LC, Benavides A, Almenara J: El péndulo bayesiano: Crónica de una polémica estadística. Llull. 2002, 25: 109-128.

Google Scholar

Goodman SN, Royall R: Evidence and scientific research. Am J Public Health. 1988, 78: 1568-1574. 10.2105/AJPH.78.12.1568.

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Berger JO, Berry DA: Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. Am Sci. 1988, 76: 159-165.

Google Scholar

Hurlbert SH, Lombardi CM: Final collapse of the Neyman-Pearson decision theoretic framework and rise of the neoFisherian. Ann Zool Fenn. 2009, 46: 311-349.

Article
Google Scholar

Fidler F, Thomason N, Cumming G, Finch S, Leeman J: Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals but they can't make them think: Statistical reform lessons from Medicine. Psychol Sci. 2004, 15: 119-126. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502008.x.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Balluerka N, Vergara AI, Arnau J: Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs. Psicothema. 2009, 21: 141-151.

Google Scholar

Cumming G, Fidler F: Confidence intervals: Better answers to better questions. J Psychol. 2009, 217: 15-26.

Google Scholar

Jones LV, Tukey JW: A sensible formulation of the significance test. Psychol Methods. 2000, 5: 411-414. 10.1037/1082-989X.5.4.411.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Dixon P: The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it. Can J Exp Psychol. 2003, 57: 189-202.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC: Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007, 82: 591-605. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Brandstaetter E: Confidence intervals as an alternative to significance testing. MPR-Online. 2001, 4: 33-46.

Google Scholar

Masson ME, Loftus GR: Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Can J Exp Psychol. 2003, 57: 203-220.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Update October 2008. Accessed July 11, 2009, [http://www.icmje.org]

Feinstein AR: P-Values and Confidence Intervals: two sides of the same unsatisfactory coin. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998, 51: 355-360. 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00295-3.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Haller H, Kraus S: Misinterpretations of significance: A problem students share with their teachers?. MRP-Online. 2002, 7: 1-20.

Google Scholar

Gigerenzer G, Krauss S, Vitouch O: The null ritual: What you always wanted to know about significance testing but were afraid to ask. The Handbook of Methodology for the Social Sciences. Edited by: Kaplan D. 2004, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Chapter 21: 391-408.

Google Scholar

Curran-Everett D, Taylor S, Kafadar K: Fundamental concepts in statistics: elucidation and illustration. J Appl Physiol. 1998, 85: 775-786.

CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Royall RM: Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. 1997, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC

Google Scholar

Goodman SN: Of P values and Bayes: A modest proposal. Epidemiology. 2001, 12: 295-297. 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00006.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Sarria M, Silva LC: Tests of statistical significance in three biomedical journals: a critical review. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004, 15: 300-306.

Article
Google Scholar

Silva LC: Una ceremonia estadística para identificar factores de riesgo. Salud Colectiva. 2005, 1: 322-329.

Google Scholar

Goodman SN: Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics 1: The p Value Fallacy. Ann Intern Med. 1999, 130: 995-1004.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Schulz KF, Grimes DA: Sample size calculations in randomised clinical trials: mandatory and mystical. Lancet. 2005, 365: 1348-1353. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61034-3.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Bacchetti P: Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives. BMC Med. 2010, 8: 17-10.1186/1741-7015-8-17.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Silva LC: Diseño razonado de muestras para la investigación sanitaria. 2000, Madrid: Díaz de Santos

Google Scholar

Barnett ML, Mathisen A: Tyranny of the p-value: The conflict between statistical significance and common sense. J Dent Res. 1997, 76: 534-536. 10.1177/00220345970760010201.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Santiago MI, Hervada X, Naveira G, Silva LC, Fariñas H, Vázquez E, Bacallao J, Mújica OJ: [The Epidat program: uses and perspectives] [letter]. Pan Am J Public Health. 2010, 27: 80-82. Spanish.

Article
Google Scholar

Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977, 33: 159-74. 10.2307/2529310.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Fidler F, Burgman MA, Cumming G, Buttrose R, Thomason N: Impact of criticism of null-hypothesis significance testing on statistical reporting practices in conservation biology. Conserv Biol. 2005, 20: 1539-1544. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00525.x.

Article
Google Scholar

Kline RB: Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. 2004, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Book
Google Scholar

Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ: Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society: the sequel. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007, 31: 295-298. 10.1152/advan.00022.2007.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Hubbard R, Parsa AR, Luthy MR: The spread of statistical significance testing: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Theor Psychol. 1997, 7: 545-554. 10.1177/0959354397074006.

Article
Google Scholar

Vacha-Haase T, Nilsson JE, Reetz DR, Lance TS, Thompson B: Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size. Theor Psychol. 2000, 10: 413-425. 10.1177/0959354300103006.

Article
Google Scholar

Krueger J: Null hypothesis significance testing: On the survival of a flawed method. Am Psychol. 2001, 56: 16-26. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.1.16.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Rising K, Bacchetti P, Bero L: Reporting Bias in Drug Trials Submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: Review of Publication and Presentation. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e217-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050217. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050217

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Sridharan L, Greenland L: Editorial policies and publication bias the importance of negative studies. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169: 1022-1023. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.100.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Falagas ME, Alexiou VG: The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008, 56: 223-226. 10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5.

Article
Google Scholar

Rothman K: Writing for Epidemiology. Epidemiology. 1998, 9: 98-104. 10.1097/00001648-199805000-00019.

Article
Google Scholar

Fidler F: The fifth edition of the APA publication manual: Why its statistics recommendations are so controversial. Educ Psychol Meas. 2002, 62: 749-770. 10.1177/001316402236876.

Article
Google Scholar

Feinstein AR: Clinical epidemiology: The architecture of clinical research. 1985, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company

Google Scholar

Orlitzky M: Institutionalized dualism: statistical significance testing as myth and ceremony. Accessed Feb 8, 2010, [http://ssrn.com/abstract=1415926]

Greenwald AG, González R, Harris RJ, Guthrie D: Effect sizes and p-value. What should be reported and what should be replicated?. Psychophysiology. 1996, 33: 175-183. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02121.x.

Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar

Altman DG, Goodman SN, Schroter S: How statistical expertise is used in medical research. J Am Med Assoc. 2002, 287: 2817-2820. 10.1001/jama.287.21.2817.

Article
Google Scholar

Gardner MJ, Altman DJ: Statistics with confidence. Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. 1992, London: BMJ

Google Scholar

Goodman SN: P Values, Hypothesis Tests and Likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate. Am J Epidemiol. 1993, 137: 485-496.

CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar