World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
Article
Google Scholar
Boutron I, Guittet L, Estellat C, Moher D, Hróbjartsson A, Ravaud P. Reporting methods of blinding in randomized trials assessing nonpharmacological treatments. PLoS Med. 2007;4(2):e61.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Linde K, Dincer F. How informed is consent in sham-controlled trials of acupuncture? J Altern Complement Med. 2004;10(2):379–85.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miller FG, Kaptchuk TJ. Acupuncture trials and informed consent. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(1):43–4.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Miller FG, Colloca L. The placebo phenomenon and medical ethics: rethinking the relationship between informed consent and risk–benefit assessment. Theor Med Bioeth. 2011;32(4):229–43.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tracey I. Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans. Nat Med. 2010;16(11):1277–83.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Carlino E, Torta DM, Piedimonte A, Frisaldi E, Vighetti S, Benedetti F. Role of explicit verbal information in conditioned analgesia. Eur J Pain. 2015;19(4):546–53.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mitsikostas DD. Nocebo in headache. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(3):331–6.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bishop FL, Adams AE, Kaptchuk TJ, Lewith GT. Informed consent and placebo effects: a content analysis of information leaflets to identify what clinical trial participants are told about placebos. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39661.
Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Moroz A, Freed B, Tiedemann L, Bang H, Howell M, Park JJ. Blinding measured: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2013;2013:708251.
Article
Google Scholar
Finfgeld-Connett D. Use of content analysis to conduct knowledge-building and theory-generating qualitative systematic reviews. Qual Res. 2014;14(3):341–52.
Article
Google Scholar
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2000;1(2) https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089.
Bang H, Ni L, Davis CE. Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(2):143–56.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Park J, Bang H, Cañette I. Blinding in clinical trials, time to do it better. Complement Ther Med. 2008;16(3):121–3.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Chapter 16: special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.ch16.
Google Scholar
Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2000;19(22):3127–31.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang LP, Zhang XZ, Guo J, Liu HL, Zhang Y, Liu CZ, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture for acute migraine attack: a multicenter single blinded, randomized controlled trial. Pain Med. 2012;13(5):623–30.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wang LP, Zhang XZ, Guo J, Liu HL, Zhang Y, Liu CZ, et al. Efficacy of acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis: a single-blinded, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011;152(8):1864–71.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaptchuk TJ, Kelley JM, Conboy LA, Davis RB, Kerr CE, Jacobson EE, et al. Components of placebo effect: randomised controlled trial in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. BMJ. 2008;336(7651):999–1003.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lembo AJ, Conboy L, Kelley JM, Schnyer RS, McManus CA, Quilty MT, et al. A treatment trial of acupuncture in IBS patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(6):1489–97.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lee H, Bang H, Kim Y, Park J, Lee S, Lee H, et al. Non-penetrating sham needle, is it an adequate sham control in acupuncture research? Complement Ther Med. 2011;19(Suppl 1):S41–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, Rees R. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19(2):159–66.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
American Medical Association. Code of medical ethics, 2014–2015: of the American Medical Association. Annotated ed. United States: American Medical Association Press; 2014.
Google Scholar
Emanuel EJ, Miller FG. The ethics of placebo-controlled trials — a middle ground. New Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):915–9.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wells RE, Kaptchuk TJ. To tell the truth, the whole truth, may do patients harm: the problem of the nocebo effect for informed consent. Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(3):22–9.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Tan K, Petrie KJ, Faasse K, Bolland MJ, Grey A. Unhelpful information about adverse drug reactions. BMJ. 2014;349:g5019.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Beardsley E, Jefford M, Mileshkin L. Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(9):e13–4.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garner M, Ning Z, Francis J. A framework for the evaluation of patient information leaflets. Health Expect. 2012;15(3):283–94.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gillies K, Huang W, Skea Z, Brehaut J, Cotton S. Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation. Trials. 2014;15:62.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wilson CB. An updated declaration of Helsinki will provide more protection. Nat Med. 2013;19(6):664.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dhai A. The research ethics evolution: from Nuremberg to Helsinki. S Afr Med J. 2014;104(3):178–80.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Djavadkhani Y, Marshall NS, D'Rozario AL, Crawford MR, Yee BJ, Grunstein RR, et al. Ethics, consent and blinding: lessons from a placebo/sham controlled CPAP crossover trial. Thorax. 2015;70(3):265–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheung F. TCM: made in China. Nature. 2011;480(7378):S82–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Park HL, Lee HS, Shin BC, Liu JP, Shang Q, Yamashita H, et al. Traditional medicine in China, Korea, and Japan: a brief introduction and comparison. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2012;2012:429103.
Google Scholar
Volinn E, Yang B, He J, Sheng X, Ying J, Zuo Y. Do outcomes of acupuncture for back pain differ according to varying sociocultural contexts? The view from China. J Altern Complement Med. 2013;19(5):435–44.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dilli CR, Childs R, Berk J, Christian MK, Nguyen N, Brown RP, et al. Does prior acupuncture exposure affect perception of blinded real or sham acupuncture. Acupunct Med. 2014;32(2):155–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
White P, Lewith G, Hopwood V, Prescott P. The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in acupuncture trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial. Pain. 2003;106(3):401–9.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hróbjartsson A, Gøtzsche PC. Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1:CD003974.
Google Scholar
Kam-Hansen S, Jakubowski M, Kelley JM, Kirsch I, Hoaglin DC, Kaptchuk TJ, et al. Altered placebo and drug labeling changes the outcome of episodic migraine attacks. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(218):218ra5.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008;336(7644):601–5.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Linde K, Witt CM, Streng A, Weidenhammer W, Wagenpfeil S, Brinkhaus B, et al. The impact of patient expectations on outcomes in four randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in patients with chronic pain. Pain. 2007;128(3):264–71.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Witt CM, Martins F, Willich SN, Schützler L. Can I help you? Physicians' expectations as predictor for treatment outcome. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(10):1455–66.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Miller FG, Emanuel EJ, Rosenstein DL, Straus SE. Ethical issues concerning research in complementary and alternative medicine. JAMA. 2004;291(5):599–604.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Menoni V, Lucas N, Leforestier JF, Dimet J, Doz F, Chatellier G, et al. The readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10576.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Reinert C, Kremmler L, Burock S, Bogdahn U, Wick W, Gleiter CH, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of study-related patient information sheets in randomised neuro-oncology phase III-trials. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(1):150–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Srnka KJ, Koeszegi ST. From words to numbers: how to transform qualitative data into meaningful quantitative results. Schmalenbach Business Rev. 2007;59(1):29–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Myers MG, Cairns JA, Singer J. The consent form as a possible cause of side effects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987;42(3):250–3.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pildal J, Hróbjartsson A, Jørgensen KJ, Hilden J, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(4):847–57.
Article
CAS
PubMed
Google Scholar